Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Laphroaig Cairdeas 200th Anniversary 2015

Nozinan Mini and Sample Series - 17

1 1786

@NozinanReview by @Nozinan

11th May 2016

0

Laphroaig Cairdeas 200th Anniversary 2015
  • Nose
    22
  • Taste
    21
  • Finish
    22
  • Balance
    21
  • Overall
    86

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

Bowmore Tempest meets Laphroaig

Although the Cairdeas does not carry an age statement, the distiller has indicated that the contents have matured for between 11 and 12 years. It is bottled at 51.5% and is released to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the distillery.

Thank you to @Paddockjudge for sourcing the bottle for me and also for the sample so that I wouldn’t have to open the bottle right away.

I reviewed it in my usual manner. However, it was sampled in a mini-glencairn glass, purchased from the Laphroaig online shop, and identical to the one used by the master distiller who did his tasting video on youtube. This may have changed the way I might experience the nose a little.


Nose:

Neat – sweet peat is the first thing that hits you, reminiscent of Quarter cask. Hint of burning electrical wire. Chocolate. Candied citrus rind. Some sort of sweet tropical fruit…papaya? 22/25

With water- slightly sweeter nose, pear peeks through. Peat is subdued. No electrical fire. Smells “warmer” (22/25)

Taste:

Neat – thinner than expected. Light. Salty. Some tart citrus and lots of dry peat. Chocolate at the back of the tongue, interestingly. A bit bitter. Less sweet than the Quarter Cask. The flavour builds a little with each sip. 21/25

With Water- sweeter, fruitier, more citrus on the development. Eventually develops some effervescence. Less peat. Bitter towards the finish but more balanced. (21/25)

Finish – dry, astringent. Ashy. Lemony. Very, very long. 22/25

Balance – fairly good balance between what the nose promises and the palate delivers. A bit light in the mouthfeel, and sometimes the flavours are not balanced in the mouth. 21/25

Score: Neat – 86/100 With Water 86/100

Milk Chocolate does nothing for it. Interestingly, the modified Ashok manoeuvre (essentially gentle warming) mutes the nose and the taste, especially the peat.


This is a challenging dram. I think with perseverance it will likely be rewarding, and part of the score reflects this potential. However, I think this would scare away beginners.

With water it changes into a different, more citrusy dram, and I can get that more easily with something like Bowmore Tempest V. So I would probably be very stingy with the water next time.

I also find it disappointing that it wasn’t bottled at cask strength. The 51.5% is meant (the last 2 digits) to represent 2015. A 2015 on the bottle and CS inside would have been better.

It is noteworthy that over a half year after it was released and sold out in Ontario, and though not available on the major UK sites, a google search of the price does not show any significant increase in value. Given what I tasted today, this should come as no surprise, as there are many alternatives at or below the retail price that are available and tick off the same boxes.

If I remember to, I’ll try the second half of the sample in a regular glencairn and see if there is a difference, and report back.

Related Laphroaig reviews

17 comments

@BlueNote
BlueNote commented

@Nozinan. My impression right out of the fresh bottle was that it was a cranked up version of the 10 yr. old. I got plenty of the signature peat, smoke, medicine cabinet and rubber in both the nose and the taste. It took a good splash of water to subdue the alcohol and get it into just right drinking mode. Loved it. I have not been back to it for a while as I'm trying to make it last so I can keep my second bottle intact for as long as possible. Now, based on your experience, I am wondering if it loses some of that character and punch after it has been open for a while. Do you know if Paddockjudge's bottle had been open for a while before he took out your sample? I'll try mine again this weekend. It's been open for around 5 months now. I'll keep you posted. Cheers.

7 years ago 0

@Ol_Jas
Ol_Jas commented

I think the stable prices are probably due to certain markets getting PLENTY of this. I feel like I point this out a lot, but the uneven availability of this bottle always comes up: It was jam-packed on my local retailers' shelves when it came out last year (Madison, WI) and there's still quite a few to be found here, all at around $75 USD.

I really liked it and I bunkered some, but then I did a quick side-by-side with the 2014 to satisfy a question in a recent discussion thread and found that I actually liked it a little less than I thought, if you follow me. It's a very solid whisky but I don't think it's one we'll miss with too much heartbreak in years to come. (Find me a bottle of that 2013 port guy, though!)

7 years ago 0

@BlueNote
BlueNote commented

@OlJas. That port guy is one that I never did get a taste of. Is that where the Cairdeas peaked? I recall it looking much darker in the bottle than the other versions so the port influence must have been considerable. Hope you track one down.

7 years ago 0

@Ol_Jas
Ol_Jas commented

@BlueNote, I don't know about "peaked," given that these Cairdeases (sp?) aren't so much a unified series as much as they're a set of unrelated Laphroaigs all attached to the same sub-brand. Nitpickery aside, many Laphroaig fans do put the 2013 Port at the top of their list.

I've seen plenty of folks gush about this 2015 Cairdeas, too, and I can only guess they'd put it at the top of THEIR lists if their lists existed. I suppose it's the most "classic Laphroaig" of these recent Cairdeases.

For me, that side-by-side really helped me appreciate the 2014! Good-funky and sharp. Great stuff. I'd trade a bunkered 2015 for someone else's 2014 if the opportunity arose (which it won't).

I'm not sure what I'd pay or trade for the 2013 Port, but as the opportunity is even more unlikely to arise, I'll just content myself with the likes of Longrow RED Port, Benriach 17 Solstice (excellent), and Edradour Bellechin Port.

7 years ago 0

@Victor
Victor commented

As I recall, the 2013 Laphroaig Cairdeas Port Wood took a lot of crap when it first came out. I always liked it fine, and do own an unopened bottle of it.

7 years ago 0

Astroke commented

I enjoyed this one quite a bit, but took time for me to come to that conclusion. Unlike Bowmore Laimrig which I enjoyed from the first sip. Apples to Oranges I know but for special Islay releases the Bowmore is better.IMHO

7 years ago 0

@talexander
talexander commented

I looooove this one!

7 years ago 0

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

I think it grew on me in the glass, but as I said, what I really liked about it I got after adding water. It lost the Laphroaig smoke from the nose and gained a Bowmore Tempest citrus on the palate.

@Victor my understanding is that all the releases are differently matured so it would be hard to compare. Wait.. I think I just read that on this thread. oops.

This one will be good to open in 20 years when no one else has a bottle, and all my Tempest 10 YO is gone. @Talexander, I expect you'll want to be there...

7 years ago 0

@BlueNote
BlueNote commented

@Nozinan. I couldn't wait for the weekend so I had just a wee sip of the 2015. I was surprised to find that I was down to the last third. It's just as good or better than when I first opened the bottle 5 months ago. Come on weekend!

BTW, @talexander ain't the only one who might want to be there 20 years from now.

7 years ago 0

Taco commented

Really, really like this one. Bought my third bottle, as I ran through the first two too fast. Probably should pick up more, but having to watch expenses. Highly recommended (92).

7 years ago 0

@BlueNote
BlueNote commented

@Taco. I bought the Cairdeas 2015 and the Tempest VI at the same time (last November). Right out of the gate on first impressions I would have scored the Bowmore 90 and the Laphroaig mid to high 80s, about what @Nozinan scored it here. 7 months later with both bottles down to the last third I would reverse the scores and even go low 80s for the Tempest. For me the Tempest has lost much of its initial punch and the Cairdeas has got much better with time and air. I've sampled them both on two separate occasions in the last couple of weeks just to be sure my taste buds are working properly and my conclusion is that the Cairdeas is showing everything that distinguishes Laphroaig from the pack and the Tempest has become just another lacklustre Bowmore. I wish I could find some Laimrig 15, now that's a real Bowmore. Cheers.

7 years ago 0

@Robert99
Robert99 commented

@Nozinan For me, this Laphroaig has nothing in common with any Bowmore. It is way better, it is like the QC with some green hay and a hint of sherry cask along with some menthol note. Ok, I will concede that there is a bit of blackcurrant buds when you add water to it, but I would add of better quality. Don't add water!

7 years ago 0

Taco commented

Just did a HTHTH last night of this with the 15 and Ardbeg Auriverdes. The Laphroaig 15 was the weakest of the three and I felt the Cairdeas 14 and Auri were about equal in quality, both being really good. Both are also very drinkable w/o water, but water does change the noses and tastes in a pleasant way, so I still advise it (just not too much, or they will drown).

7 years ago 0

@BlueNote
BlueNote commented

@Taco. That's good to know. It's odd that Laphroaig put the 15 out at 43%. 48%, same as the 18, would have been better. It gets generally good reviews though.

7 years ago 0

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

I just finished @Paddockjudge's sample. Hard to believe I haven't been back to this in 9 months! Tried it in a regular glencairn this time. Sadly, it's too long since I tried it to know if there's a real difference from the mini glencairn. maybe one day I'll do a H2H review...

Anyway, this is excellent. Probably I would score it the same but tonight I won't dissect it, just enjoy it as I read.

7 years ago 1Who liked this?

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in