Whisky Connosr

Mannochmore 18yo 1990

One Smooth Sherry Bomb

0 388

@jwiseReview by @jwise

4th Feb 2011


Mannochmore 18yo 1990
  • Nose
  • Taste
  • Finish
  • Balance
  • Overall

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

One more sample from Master of Malt. I'd never heard of Mannochmore, but I just had to get a sample when I read this: "A big bodied Mannochmore - heavy on the sherry. This was distilled in 1990 and released as part of Diageo's range of special releases. Each bottle is at cask strength and individually numbered." I guess I'm a sucker for "big bodied", "heavy on sherry", and "cask strength."

It isn't as dark as Aberlour A'Bunadh, but it is a full copper.

ABV: 54.9%

Nose: Mmmmm! Sherry! It's got all the normal aromas associated with a sherry bomb: caramel, honey, lavender, a bit of anise, ripe berry fruits, and a bit of cinnamon. Delicious.

Palate: YUM! Spices coming out nicely, with a wonderfully full bodied sherry sweetness. Warming in the mouth, but not as hot as A'Bunadh.

Finish: Nice, long finish! Perfectly balanced, with a bit of spice and sherry sweetness. Smoother than the younger sherry bombs: A'Bunadh and Macallan Cask Strength.

This whisky is not winey at all. It is just a perfectly sherried dram! Big sherry, that is. Perhaps it is not as complex as others have been, but it delivers what it promises, and doesn't hold back. If you like A'Bunadh or Macallan Cask Strength, but find them a bit too 'hot' and not smooth enough, this Mannochmore might be just the ticket. The only problem is that the Mannochmore 18yr is priced at ?102. Yes, that's right, ONE HUNDRED AND TWO POUNDS! That comes out to $162, or $100 more than either of the two competitors. The Mannochmore is good, but I can't even definitively say that it is better than either of the others! If you prefer the smoother, less 'hot' Mannochmore, may I suggest adding a few drops of water to a dram of A'Bunadh, and you probably couldn't tell the difference.

So, even though I think it is a great whisky, I wouldn't recommend it. That is, unless you don't consider $165 and $60 to be appreciably different. This is definitely a great whisky to order as a sample, as I am glad I got to try it, but I sure would have been disappointed to have spent the money on a whole bottle, when I could have nearly had three bottles of A'Bunadh for the same money!

Related Mannochmore reviews


WhiskyNotes commented

If you're going to put limited and ultra-rare releases against long-time price crackers like A'Bunadh, then the limited releases are never going to win. It's like slashing Port Ellen for not being as cheap as Lagavulin 16 and not being much better.

I'm not even sure they are comparable. I only find a handful of bottlings every year with a smoothness comparable to this Mannochmore. To find a monstruous sherry release like A'Bunadh is much easier.

13 years ago 0

jwise commented

Right. The Mannochmore is extremely smooth. I think I made that point, but it deserves repeating. Additionally, it had less burn and just as much flavor as the A'Bunadh, with a great spicy treat on the finish. It was delightful. I'm just trying to bring some practicality to this space and admitting that the price is prohibitive, compared to what else is on the market in the same genre.

Let's say you are a Sherry-Monster-lover, and always wished that Aberlour would make an 18yr A'Bunadh, as you want to experience other nuances of this terrific flavor profile. Let's also say that spending $100-200 on a bottle of whisky isn't that big of a deal. With these facts, this Mannochmore is DEFINITELY something you should seek out.

But to say that they aren't comparable is not doing a service to the whisky-loving community. Mac 12yr to Mac 18yr = A'Bunadh to Mannochmore 18yr.

13 years ago 0

jwise commented

Ah! I'm enjoying the last few sips of this whisky left in the bottle. It is superb. Very smooth, very big, very delicious! Much easier to drink than A'Bunadh, and just as rich. Too bad about the price, eh? Down the hatch!

12 years ago 0