Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Glenfarclas 17 Year Old

Morose Encounters of the First Kind

0 786

RReview by @Rigmorole

20th Jan 2013

0

  • Nose
    ~
  • Taste
    ~
  • Finish
    ~
  • Balance
    ~
  • Overall
    86

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

Perhaps I'm not a Speysider when it comes to the living water, at least not as much as I'd once thought.

I have tried some of the top shelf Aberlours and liked them quite a lot, especially the 18 and the A'bunadh.

This said, I guess I have been harboring a grudge against low end Glenfiddich and Glenlivet from my younger years that still haunts.

Tonight, before dinner at the pub, a glass of Glenfarclas 17 evoked bad memories at first whiff. In time, the better elementals respired in the glass, coming to life.

Still, all in all, I was not overly impressed. The palate could not shake a cloying perfume-y scent that that reminded me distantly of, well, Cutty Sark? Ugh.

Rewind to last night after work when I stopped by 10th Avenue Liquor in Portland on my way home, and was steered wrong by a clerk there who suggested that I tuck in a bottle of The MacTarnahan (alleged 9 year-old Glenfarclas) along with a pleasing pair: Tobermory 15 and a Glendronach 15 Revival--both the last bottles in the store, and which I intended to buy before even entering the premises.

Alas, the MacTarnahan turned out to be odious at best, only fit for mixed drinks, as far as I'm concerned after opening it and pouring a sip when I got home. I'm sure future guests will like it well enough with mixers.

Fast forward to the Glenfarclas 17 tonight: A little time in the class cured the bad memories of cheap Speysides from my past (along with the morose ghost of Cutty Sark), but the 17 was not what I had hoped it would be, even in the final analysis.

I followed up the Glenfarclas with a dram of Dalmore Cigar Malt, which I like great deal more, even though it was not the most sophisticated glass of whiskey that I've had the pleasure of drinking.

Before leaving the pub, I hovered over a glass of the Bowmore 16 DT. It certainly wasn't the best Bowmore I've tasted. In fact, I had a glass of the 15 (not darkest) a few weeks ago at Kells Irish Pub. The plain 15 year was delicious and astonishingly good. If memory serves, I much preferred it to the 16 DT tonight. (Perhaps "DT" should stand for Delirium Tremens and not Duncan Taylor. Will a bad pun like that get me kicked off this site? I hope not! A joke, just a joke!!!)

All hail the HIghland Stillhouse for enabling occasional forays into disappointment, as well as the glad eye of good fortune when'er it shines (through the hole in my pocketbook where fresh cabbage used to bloom). The Stillhouse has hundreds of bottles to choose from. A trip there is always an adventure in accidental tourism, and I wouldn't trade even my least favorite glass of the "living water" for anything. Experientia docet.

Related Glenfarclas reviews

7 comments

Rigmorole commented

The MacTarnahan has improved after being opened for a few days. It needs air, to be sure. I no longer think it is only for mixed whisky drinks. It's actually not so bad at all. I've had over company, and people seem to like it quite a lot.

At any rate, judging by the subtle and somewhat classy carmely and sherry-eque flavors, I now must consider the possibility that it is indeed 9.5 year old Glenfarclas.

I also wish very much I could taste a 15 year Glenfarclas. Alas, it is nowhere to be found in Oregon. Even the Highland Stillhouse has none.

I stand by my original opinion that the Glenfarclas 17 year was good but too expensive for how it tasted. This said, I'm now interested in trying the 105. I've heard good things about this Glenfarclas fiery cask strength dram.

8 years ago 0

@talexander
talexander commented

I'm with you on this one - I liked it, didn't love it. The 105 is fantastic, though. I had the great pleasure of attending a Glenfarclas tasting in Aberlour, during the Speyside Whisky Festival - George Grant was there setting up the bottles on a shitty flimsy table, working his ass off, at the Mash Tun Restaurant / Hotel. It did not include the 17 Year Old (nor the 12 Year Old, strangely) but hit everything else - the greatest drams were the 15 and the 40. Although the 40 will run you at least $300, that's a good price for a 40 year old scotch, and well worth it, IMHO. But the 15 is dynamite, I urge you to try it.

8 years ago 0

Rigmorole commented

Can't get the 15 in Oregon. The OLCC won't allow it as a special order from a liquor store.

8 years ago 0

Rigmorole commented

Farc 40 in Oregon: $456

8 years ago 0

@talexander
talexander commented

Wow - that IS pricey! Still cheaper than pretty much any 40yo single malt you could find...

8 years ago 0

Rigmorole commented

$456 on Masters of Malt. $300 is a frickin steal! You lucky bastard. . . ; )

8 years ago 0

numen commented

@rigmorole, your best bet ordering from the US is the Wine Exchange (~$400, and in CA, so not far away). There are a few places in Europe that have it for around $340, but you may not want to (or be able/feel comfortable) ordering from smaller shops there. If I could get the 40 for $300, I'd buy two. It's that good.

8 years ago 0

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in