The galg-Anonymous connection?

Among the most recent reviews by @galg are Maker's Mark (standard expression), Maker's Mark 46, and the Glenlivet Nadurra. Among the most recent reviews by @Anonymous are Maker's Mark (standard expression), Maker's Mark 46, and the Glenlivet Nadurra. Both of their reviews of Maker's 46 are nearly identical—the differences are but a few words here and there, and half a star in the rating, but even the typos are the same—strongly suggesting that the newer review (by Anonymous) has been copied and modified only slightly from the earlier one, posted eight days earlier (by galg). Their reviews of Maker’s (standard) are again nearly identical; this time, the only difference is the substitution of “?” (Anonymous’s review) for “Bottom line” (galg’s review), and this time, Anonymous’s review came first (though they were posted within the same hour). Finally, their reviews of the Glenlivet Nadurra are again nearly identical, other than the addition of opening and closing paragraphs in Anonymous’s review; again, Anonymous’s review came first, but they were posted within the same hour.

Things get more interesting. Although Anonymous’s reviews of Maker’s (standard) and the Glenlivet Nadurra were posted prior to galg’s on Connosr, both reviews were published on galg’s whisky review blog, Whisky Israel (whiskyisrael.co.il), a week ago. The additional text in Anonymous's review of the Glenlivet Nadurra on Connosr was indeed part of galg's post on Whisky Israel.

Hypotheses, anyone? Could Anonymous, “the phantom whisky reviewer”, BE galg—perhaps forgetting to log out of one account before logging in to the other? Could Anonymous be the most blatant plagiarist known to Man? Could there be a conspiracy afoot, or something decidedly more ordinary? Could I have drunk too much coffee this morning? Let the rampant speculation begin!