Whisky Connosr
Shop Join

Ardbeg 5 Year Old Wee Beastie


10 684

@markjedi1Review by @markjedi1

6th Jul 2020


Ardbeg 5 Year Old Wee Beastie
  • Nose
  • Taste
  • Finish
  • Balance
  • Overall

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

You have to admit it: Ardbeg has guts. For as long as I can remember the Ten was (and is!) the entry level malt – and a very good one too! An absolutely brilliant Ardbeg. And while they added the An Oa (a NAS release) to the core range only recently, it is now joined by one with an age statement… but a very young one, just 5 years. In traditional (is it?) Ardbeg Style, they gave it a resounding name: Wee Beastie. It’s a vatting of both bourbon and oloroso sherry casks and upon release it was priced between 35 and 45 EUR, but in some markets it was markedly more expensive.

It cannot hide it’s young age on the nose, but it does not suffer from any new make-y or other off notes. This is actually quite nice. The sweet and sour peat is unmistakable, but it does not yet make the malt medicinal. I’m surprised by the fact that this Ardbeg is very sweet. I get apples, overripe pears, banana, apricots, citrus, vanilla and caramel. A nice spiciness with cubeb pepper, aniseed and liquorice. After a few moments, it does turn somewhat maritime with a salty edge and some moss. This is young, but very pleasant and textbook Ardbeg.

The body is nicely oily indeed. And on the palate it shows its true colors. This is indeed Ardbeg pur sang: peaty, smoky, peppery, lots of citrus fruit, ashes and tar, smoked ham… but with a sweet twist that really entertains. Vanilla, milk chocolate, dessert wine. This is very quaffable. Good strength, by the way. This is a lovely dram.

The finish is not very long, but good: spicy of soft oak and sweet smoke. I think it would be unfair – and quite useless – to compare this Wee Beastie with the Ten, unless it’s only to calculate if you are getting value for money. It’s less balanced that the Ten, a bit more playful, but in my book a very good addition to the core range. This one gets to stay. By the way: a 3cl dram of this stuff is only 76 kilo calories. A banana is around 150. Choose wisely.

Related Ardbeg reviews


Nozinan commented

Unless I were potassium deficient, I think I know which of these I would choose. But I wonder, for the best of both worlds... banana flambe?

3 years ago 2Who liked this?

RianC commented

If definitely like to try this but for the same price as the Ten, what's the point? That and I'm yet to see it anywhere on open sale!

I'm reticent to be the harbinger of doom but I suspect, in time, the price of the Ten will see a shift upwards if this sticks around.

3 years ago 1Who liked this?

Nozinan commented

I have to admit I'm intrigued by this one and would like to try it. I'm not sure how I will get it, and also not sure if I want a whole bottle of it. Too bad they don't have 10cl bottles...

3 years ago 0

DaveM commented

Thanks for the review. I wondered how the 5 year old would hold up to the 10 year old. I can’t see the point of buying this if the prices of 5 and 10 are comparable.

3 years ago 0

MadSingleMalt commented

@RianC, I thought the same thing when An Oa came out—that its real purpose was to become the new "cheap" Ardbeg so they could reposition the Ten a step or two higher in price. That never really happened, though, so who knows.

3 years ago 1Who liked this?

Megawatt commented

This has appeared in Ontario, $23 cheaper than the 10. Reviews have been mixed but I’m liking these notes.

2 years ago 1Who liked this?

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in