Whisky Connosr
Menu
Buy Whisky Online

Auchentoshan 1990 Silveroak

Digestif Deluxe

0 392

@markjedi1Review by @markjedi1

17th Oct 2012

0

Auchentoshan 1990 Silveroak
  • Nose
    ~
  • Taste
    ~
  • Finish
    ~
  • Balance
    ~
  • Overall
    92

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

The Silveroak, a 21 Year Old Auchentoshan from 1990, is also a mix of bourbon and oloroso sherry casks, bottled at a sturdy strength of 51,5% ABV (no, it is not a cask strength, this was bottled at 51,5% on purpose). It has a deep golden glow and beads beautifully, suggesting a full body. It is named after the silver rings that can be found in the trunk of an older tree (or so it says on the box). Whatever, I am very much looking forward to this.

Ooh, the nose is simply marvellous. Dried flowers, but also fresh roses, dark and dried fruits, baked banana soaked in orange juice, honeysuckle and mint, jasmine, butterscotch, acacia honey, roasted almonds, Turkish delight, light brown sugar and whipped cream. Wow, this is one helluva Toshan!

It is wonderfully creamy on the palate with brown sugar and cappuccino. Raisins and liquorice. Great chocolate with mint, like After Eight. Again quite some banana, which I often find in aged Auchentoshan.

The finish lasts and lasts on chocolate and almonds.

What a grand Auchentoshan, indeed. This is so much more than the regular Auchentoshan 21 Year Old on cask strength. This is a digestif deluxe that will silence many critics of this Lowlander. Around 90 EUR, which I find to be more than acceptable for a 21 year old on this strength.

Related Auchentoshan reviews

3 comments

@GregLogan
GregLogan commented

Looks like you tried a couple bottles of this - the other you rated at 88. What was the difference?

10 years ago 0

@markjedi1
markjedi1 commented

@GregLogan: I tried both releases, 2012 versus 2013. I found the difference quite big between the release. I found the second release to be lighter of both body and nose. The oak was louder on the second batch as well. I prefer the first batch (at a slightly higher strength).

10 years ago 0

@GregLogan
GregLogan commented

Interesting - the Releases are so important since they are obviously different vattings of completely different barrels - and, thus, really a different whisky other than maintaining the general trappings of the distillery itself. I learned this the hard way with a Balblair 1991 Release 2 (vs the Release 1 that I really liked...) - 3 bottles worth of a hard way - not bad but nothing like Release 1.

OK - thanks for helping me keep in mind the importance of a seeming subtlety that is really not very subtle.

10 years ago 0