Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Bearface Triple Oak

Grizzly Bear or Teddy Bear?

4 1085

@OdysseusUnboundReview by @OdysseusUnbound

18th Nov 2018

2

  • Nose
    22
  • Taste
    22
  • Finish
    20
  • Balance
    21
  • Overall
    85

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: user

  • Brand: Bearface
  • ABV: 42.5%

This is a new Canadian whisky. I only found out about it because I got an email from their sales rep/marketing person/brand ambassador. Maybe my blog isn't so invisible after all. That said, they didn't send me a free bottle so I'm not at a Davin de Kergommeaux or Dave Broom level just yet. Apologies if this write-up is longer than usual, but I believe this is the first review of this whisky on Connosr, so I thought I'd lay some groundwork and save you some Googling.

From their press release, I found out that the makers of Bearface sourced "exceptional 7-year-old Canadian whisky from the shores of Lake Huron" and then "Mission Hill Family Estate Winery allowed Master Blender Andres Faustinelli to experiment with countless barrel and wood combinations with the objective of developing an expertly hand-finished process that would give BEARFACE a unique character, distinct from traditional Canadian Whisky."

From the Lake Huron write-up, I'm guessing this was distilled at Canadian Mist/Collingwood distillery.

More from the official write-up:

This single grain whisky starts life aging in ex-bourbon charred American Oak barrels for a minimum of seven years...It is then placed in tight-grained French Oak ex-wine barrels with over seven years of use for high end, rich Bordeaux-style wines that Mission Hill are noted for...The final finish...is with 3-year-old, air-dried virgin Hungarian Oak

Tasting Notes

  • Nose (undiluted): I'm reminded of Wayne Gretzky No.99 Red Cask right away. Fruity, with a strong corn whisky (sweet, soft caramels) presence. Maple notes, rose petals, and a few solvent/spirit notes at first. But the acetone notes dissipate within 5-10 minutes and some oak notes appear along side some icing sugar and vanilla.
  • Palate (undiluted): much richer than I expected from 42.5 % abv, and a bit darker in flavour too. Amber maple syrup, a hint of oak and spice (cloves mostly), red grapes, vanilla, roses, icing sugar. Very creamy, silky and SMOOTH mouthfeel.
  • Finish: medium length, silly as it may sound I’m reminded of Cap’N Crunch's Crunchberries with milk, and with the creamy vanilla and fruity notes lingering.

This whisky gets a bit less interesting with water, as the fruity and floral notes all but disappear, and the vanilla and caramel dominate. At 93 proof, there's no need to add water. This one is much better neat. I have no idea if there will be a Bearface distillery or not, but I've emailed the marketing rep for more information.

This is a very interesting whisky, but I don't think it will change the "sweet and friendly" image of Canadian whisky. There's no bite, no bold punch. Despite the "fearless" marketing and the bear claw marks on the bottle (which is actually pretty cool looking), this whisky is more teddy bear than grizzly bear. That's not to say it's uninteresting; it's very sweet and creamy, like a dessert. It is much richer than I expected it to be, and dangerously easy to drink. This could easily become a staple for casual sipping. At $35-$40 here in Ontario, it's definitely worth your time. I'm 90% certain I'll purchase another bottle.

10 comments

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

Thanks for taking this on. I think I'll probably pass, given my full cabinet, but I feel I've tasted it vicariously through you.

This is one that would be great in a 50 cc mini to try before buying...

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

@OdysseusUnbound
OdysseusUnbound commented

@Nozinan Now you tell me....I finished the bottle last night. Mayhap if I buy another before December...

5 years ago 0

@OdysseusUnbound
OdysseusUnbound commented

@Nozinan It wouldn’t be solely on your account. I try to keep some ordered “slots” in my cabinet and “budget-friendly sipper” is one of those slots. This whisky fits there. I like it more than Alberta Premium Dark Horse which seems to have put out some bad batches lately...

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

@Megawatt
Megawatt commented

Crunchberries! Nice reference...now I have a craving.

I'll be posting my review in the next couple of days. Nice review, by the way. I agree it is a good whisky but does little to reinvent the style as they claim. Stillwaters is way ahead of them in that department with their Stalk and Barrel brand.

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

@Megawatt
Megawatt commented

Also, I think your math is a little off. This is 85 proof, not 93.

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

@OdysseusUnbound
OdysseusUnbound commented

@Megawatt You’re right. I guess that’s why I teach history and philosophy and not maths. I’m not sure about the Stalk & Barrel bottlings. I’ve only had the blue label and it was sickly sweet with marshmallow flavour and nothing else. It really put me off buying anything else from them without sampling it first.

5 years ago 0

@paddockjudge
paddockjudge commented

@Megawatt, I think he poured an ounce-and-a-half...and rounded down thinking

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

@Megawatt
Megawatt commented

@OdysseusUnbound

In my opinion, S&B Red Label is a whole different story, while the Canada 150 bottling is a candidate for Canadian Whisky of the Year. But yeah, the Blue label is a weird one.

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

Tried it at a store. Pleasant. Would easily accept at a party but I won't buy my own.

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in