Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Lagavulin 12 Year Old bottled 2014 14th Release

Big Big Big

0 490

@MaltActivistReview by @MaltActivist

15th Aug 2015

0

  • Nose
    23
  • Taste
    22
  • Finish
    23
  • Balance
    22
  • Overall
    90

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

I remember my first Lagavulin and, yes, it was the 16; just like everyone else. Unlike most first-timers who can get dissuaded by the ashy peat and smoke my palate actually cut through that and went to the delicate sweetness that nestled underneath.

It was one of the first whiskies that I had reviewed (quite a cringe-worthy review if you ask me) but at least I knew a good whisky when I saw one. Even back then.

Since then, I am quite happy to report, that I have yet to be disappointed by a Lagavulin. They don't release a million expressions a year, instead, choosing to focus on what they do best.

One of the standard expressions they churn out now is the 12 year old cask strength which they've been releasing every year for the last 13 years. Each edition is a different strength and with minor variances in taste.

What I've done for this particular tasting is, for the very first time, pair a dark chocolate with the whisky and report on the how the palate is influenced.

The 2014 bottling has been vatted from re-fill American Oak from spirit distilled in 2001 and 2002. My sample is from a previously opened bottle (almost full) and served at a cask strength of 54.4%

Nose: Oysters. Sharp lime. Understated ash. Apples. Apricot. Jute bag. Melon rind. White pepper. Gets sootier as you let it breathe. Touch of water will open it up a touch. Becomes slightly sweeter, though, not by much. Becomes drier. Almost cardboard dry. Good nose. And I didn't expect anything less. 23/25

Palate: Chocolate. Lime. Lemon. Pineapple. Salt. White pepper. Very intense. Ash. Smoked barbeque. Quite savory. Touch bitter. With water it's a gentler dram. Less spice. Quite chewy. 22/25

Finish: Long. Oily. Touch of oak. Grass. Almost mentholated. Leaves the mouth numb, though. With water is much nicer with more accentuated flavors. (23/25)

For my chocolate pairing experiment I decided to go with 70% Lindt. A small piece to coat my mouth before tasting the spirit.

Tasting notes with chocolate:

Palate: Very interesting. Creatives a protective coating and cuts the spice. Brings out more fruit. Makes it seem full-bodied. I definitely prefer it after a small piece of dark chocolate.

Finish: The finish sees the most dramatic difference after the introduction of chocolate. Lots of mocha. Java. Espresso. Cocoa beans. Cinnamon. Lovely.

Overall Comments: True to it's range it is a big and bold whisky. It doesn't promise layer upon layer of complex flavors but what it has are on point. Very tasty dram. Made even more tasty with a bit of bitter dark chocolate.

Related Lagavulin reviews

4 comments

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

I tried this H2H with the 2011. I found the 2011 had richer flavour and I preferred it.

6 years ago 0

@MaltActivist
MaltActivist commented

@Nozinan I've not had the 2011 so can't say. But I feel they are all quite good and pretty much in the same flavor quadrant. Which, in my opinion, is both a good thing and, perhaps, a bad thing. Consistent quality vs predictable flavors.

What a conundrum.

6 years ago 0

@Cunundrum
Cunundrum commented

Drank a glass of the 2014 recently as was not really very blown away by it. I was expecting more. Could the 2013 have been better? I have no way of comparing the two side by side, but I seem to recall liking it more even though I did not keep tasting notes. I would say the 2014 lacks a bit of depth in my estimation. Delicious but "shallow" in terms of peatiness.

6 years ago 0

@Ol_Jas
Ol_Jas commented

^ Speak of the devil.

6 years ago 0

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in