Whisky Connosr
Menu
Buy Whisky Online

Discussions

Rating System for Reviews

6 8

@MaltActivist
MaltActivist started a discussion

I'd like to bring up this topic for discussion one more time. As a prolific writer of review on Connosr I think there needs to be rating system for reviews.

As of right now I have no idea how many people are actually reading my reviews or even liking them. A simple thumbs up and thumbs down on each review should do the trick.

Better yet if there can be a counter to see how many people have actually clicked through to a review.

Because without all that I feel like I'm writing reviews which no one really cares about. Since this is a site where the user generates all the content I feel the users' efforts must be recognized.

10 years ago

8 replies

Anxyous replied

Ye' olde thumbs up / down definitely sounds like a good idea, and it's easy to pull off. I agree.

10 years ago 0

@MaltActivist
MaltActivist replied

If this is not possible then I request all members to leave a 'TFTR' on every review they read.

TFTR = Thanks For The Review.

A simple gesture to appreciate someone's efforts.

10 years ago 0

@MCM
MCM replied

Yeah, it is difficult to know, and or disappointing to not know who is reading your work.

I for one, click on and at least skim most of the new reviews.

10 years ago 1Who liked this?

@vanPelt
vanPelt replied

I agree with the sentiment-- although I'd hate the clutter of TFTRs all over! Parts of this website need a reboot, and this is a great candidate. (Also stock pictures of bottles haven't been added for 2 years, and the search function is flat-out not working.) Some time back..., @Jean-Luc mentioned a possible significant website re-vamp coming? Would be great to hear when!

I guess most of we reviewers think we're doing some kind of public service, but without some kind of feedback (about whether we're helping 1, 10, 100, or 10000 prospective buyers) it's easy to lose motivation. I even feel like slowing down too... And I would guess that the number (and QUality) of reviews would substantially increase if this were done.

10 years ago 4Who liked this?

@Nozinan
Nozinan replied

I have found the reviews helpful in making purchasing decisions, and when I'm not buying I do enjoy reading a good review.

10 years ago 1Who liked this?

@WhiskyBee
WhiskyBee replied

Some message boards have a "Thanks" button that readers can click. A list of those who clicked is then compiled in a box at the bottom of the page. No clutter of "TFTR" responses.

I don't really mind if my reviews don't get an immediate response. I figure we're offering a useful service by compiling a database of reviews that people can reference when they're considering a particular whisky. I've written a few that had no response for a year, until someone happened to be looking for opinions on whatever I reviewed. Plus, a lot of us review hard-to-find IBs and other obscure stuff for which we can't expect big readership. (Of course, I read Serge Valentin's reviews every day, and most of us will never try 95% of the whiskies he samples!)

So, yeah, a simple way of saying "thanks" would be nice. Otherwise, I just reason that our reviews will be there if and when somebody wants to read them.

10 years ago 2Who liked this?

@MCM
MCM replied

@tabarakRazvi Also, your review of Talisker 18 has been the featured review on the front page for at least a year. ;)

10 years ago 0

@MaltActivist
MaltActivist replied

@MCM yes, I know my Talisker review's been on the home page for a long time. I don't agree with that either. I think featured reviews need to be randomized.

10 years ago 0

Liked by:

@Nolinske@Pierre_W@hunggar@vanPelt@whiskyed + 1 others