Whisky Connosr
Shop Join

Benriach 12 Year Old Heredotus Fumosus Pedro Ximinez Peated

Sweety Peaty

0 487

@markjedi1Review by @markjedi1

5th Aug 2010


  • Nose
  • Taste
  • Finish
  • Balance
  • Overall

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

BenRiach has classic Speyside style and Wood Finished whiskies, but the latter also come in peated versions. There is the Heredotus Fumosus (Sherry finish), the Importanticus Fumosus (Tawny Port finish) and the Arumaticus Fumosus (Dark Rum finish).

I tried the 12 Year Old Heredotus Fumosus, that matured on American ex-bourbon casks before getting ACE’d on Pedro Ximinez sherry butts. 530 cases (i.e. 3180 bottles) were released in 2007.

The nose is, to put it mildly, complex. Vanilla and young, sweet peat, dry wood, citrusy notes, but first and foremost crispy bacon. It lacks any typical Islay connotations such as iodine and seewead. It does have sultanas and cloves. Hmmm… this is a big, layered nose.

It took a while before I sipped my dram, because I couldn’t stop nosing it. It’s simply that good. But all good things, etc… so I allowed the golden liquid to enter the salivating cavity beneath the nose. The bacon came to me first, soon surpassed by licquorice and peat, caramel and something that reminds me of soja sauce. The PX does not put its foot down.

The finish last longer than a Florida afternoon shower and is again, just like the nose, dominated by the bacon and sweet peat.

The price tag is more than fair, too, at around £30. In 2008, this expression won a silver medal at the International Wine & Spirits Competition. A very nice specimen of a Sweety Peaty Speysider.

Related BenRiach reviews


jdcook commented

Added to the wishlist!

12 years ago 0

jeanluc commented


12 years ago 0

Robert99 commented

Great review. I agree with you, it is a good value. I would simply add that I was comparing a couple of sherry beast the other night among which was this Herodotus and the petroleum of the peat was really coming out. Both oily and smoky. Since that good be a game changer for some people, I thought it was important to say it. For myself, I would give it an 89, so that tells you were I am standing.

7 years ago 0

Robert99 commented

It was "that could be" and not "that good be".

7 years ago 0

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in