Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Caol Ila 12 Year Old

Peat and Brine

0 782

@VictorReview by @Victor

22nd Aug 2012

0

Caol Ila 12 Year Old
  • Nose
    21
  • Taste
    20
  • Finish
    20
  • Balance
    21
  • Overall
    82

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

Nose: moderate to strong sweet peat, honey, and brine. There is a bit of smoke, but the peat is much more pronounced than is the smoke. Pleasant

Taste: sweet peat and a little smoke contrasted with brine is what you get. There is a bit of background slight fruit flavour as though from partial wine-cask aging. If so, it is a minor suit compared to the peated malt and brine theme. This is flavourful and simple

Finish: long peated finish, with the other flavours also remaining

Balance: this is quintessential moderately peated Islay malt. It will appeal to many peat buffs, though, to my palate, I prefer a heavier medicinal influence with my Islay peat, than this whisky has

Related Caol Ila reviews

7 comments

@SquidgyAsh
SquidgyAsh commented

Good review! Makes me hope that the 30 yr old Caol ila is ALOT better though. This is one of the few Islay's I've yet to try so fingers crossed!

11 years ago 0

@cpstecroix
cpstecroix commented

You know, for an easy peated dram, on a fall afternoon, maybe in a flask, it's hard to go wrong with the Caol Ila 12. It may replace Laga 16 for me.

11 years ago 0

@Victor
Victor commented

@cpstecroix, and with your flask of Caol Ila 12, will you be playing rugby?

11 years ago 0

mywhisky commented

Your reviews are always helpful victor, thanks. I would like to ask a question about a comment in the review. You said it was more peat than smoke. I'm new to scotch, but as I understand it peat is the sort of medicinal iodine component? I also assumed that the peat and the smokiness went hand in hand, but is there a malt that has good smoke without so much medicine?

11 years ago 0

@Victor
Victor commented

@mywhisky, 'medicinal iodine' usually refers to brine and the sea air components. These include sodium salt, iodine, seaweed, and perhaps some additional nuances from sea brine. 'Smoke' usually refers to the peat smoke used to dry the malted barley, which persists to some degree to be experienced in both the nose and the palate. 'Peat' separate from smoke is an experience of the decaying earthy vegetative matter which is peat, without the simultaneous smell and taste of smokiness, as from the burning of that peat. Some whiskies which use peatsmoke for barley malt drying will give very little taste of the smoke per se, but significant flavour of the peat itself, absent the burnt or smokey element. Some malts also use water from a peated source, but do not burn peat to generate smoke to dry the barley-malt. Bruichladdich Rocks, for example, uses peated water but does not use peat-smoke for drying the barley. You can taste the earthy peat there, but there is no smokiness. Smokiness is far more transient once you open the bottle than is peatiness. Even very smokey whiskies like most Laphroaigs will show a very large decrease in smokiness within a few weeks of opening a new bottle.

Smokey whiskies generally tend to be also briney/medicinal. There is still some range though. Some highland malts, like Brora, may be smokey with little briney medicinal component.

11 years ago 0

mywhisky commented

Thank you so much for the clarification.

11 years ago 0

@Jonesz
Jonesz commented

Victor another Thank-you from me regarding the info on peat/smoke etc. Just wanting to branch into Islay whiskies and was confused as to what the terms referred to. In reading reviews I was treating them as the same thing. Jonesz

11 years ago 0

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in