Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Glenlivet Cipher

Marketing with a side of marketing

1 671

@MaltActivistReview by @MaltActivist

20th Nov 2016

0

Glenlivet Cipher
  • Nose
    ~
  • Taste
    ~
  • Finish
    ~
  • Balance
    ~
  • Overall
    71

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

I laugh at whiskies like these.

I laugh at marketing tactics like these.

All well and good for the casual drinker hurrying through Travel Retail looking to bring home a story. But grumpy bloggers like me, who have a point to prove, can only roll their eyes as far back into their sockets as they'll go and emit distasteful snorts.

First up, let me tell you how I feel about Glenlivet.

They are the reason I drink whisky today. If I hadn't accidentally picked up a bottle of the 15 year old French Oak Reserve I might still be stocking my bar with two litre bottles of Grey Goose. That whisky taught me about flavours, balance and above all a delicious subtlety that I could never have related to a spirit like whisky. It's not the best whisky in the world, far from it, but I have a special soft spot for it.

I then fell in love with the 16 year old Nadurra Cask Strength. The old school release. I challenge anyone to defy this perfectly matured and wonderfully crisp expression that has my heart racing every time I take a sip. It is the reason why I'm such a sucker for high strength whiskies today. Once again the flavours and balance are spot on.

While the majority of their whiskies may be borderline boring (read ) I give them their due for championing their easy-going brand of liquid among the masses. Alongside Glenfiddich they deserve a ton of credit for putting dependable single malt whiskies in the hands of the new generation.

Which brings me to the second time they've pulled this little trick. The first one was called the Alpha. A whisky with absolutely no information. In an era where consumers are increasingly asking for more information Glenlivet decided it would be a fun idea to do exactly the opposite. No age, no cask, no notes; absolutely nothing. Drink it and figure it out.

Sure, why not. I'll come along. You have me intrigued. The fact that the spirit was barely average didn't help but, hey, these things happen. I played along as did everyone else. Now if you could please go back and make some tasty whiskies that would be great.

Well, they didn't. They started making some really bad whiskies. Discontinued the 12 year old and replaced it with the Founders Reserve; absolute piss. Bastardised my favourite Nadurra by taking away the age and corrupting it with over-oaked Oloroso. Generally taking everything they stood for and began running it into the ground.

And on top of that decided to re-hash the experiment that never worked in the first place and released yet another mystery malt. Come on! No one cares! Just because this time around it comes with a website where I have to guess the flavours doesn't make this a good whisky. Because it's not.

Had at a party, where my gracious host unveiled it for all of us to try it was greeted with clucks of disapprovals and shaking of heads. And that's what my biggest peeve is. Customers who spend good money to buy marketing spiel in the hope of creating a positive experience by sharing it among friends. And imagine when it has the absolute opposite effect.

Sad.

My sample is from a brand new bottle and served at 48%

Don't have to tell me it's sherry. Lots of it. Immediate on the nose. You know it's Glenlivet thanks to the vanilla. The strong green apple. Red berries. Now more chocolate. Dark. The oak is quite distinct here. Doesn't bode well for the palate, methinks.

Just as I suspected. That oak has taken over everything. Very drying. Pencil shavings. Some ginger spice. Vanilla. Quite tannic. Dark chocolate. Dark honey. Those red apples again. But the oak's made everything too bitter for me to like it.

Medium. Very dry. Very oaky.

I think I've said what I had to say. Cool bottle, though.

Related Glenlivet reviews

6 comments

@Pete1969
Pete1969 commented

I have deliberately avoided any other expression of the Nadurra than the 16 year old and do not intend ever buying one. Personally I would rather they priced that according to demand than release inferior bottlings and after trying the master distillers reserve will not be buying any NAS Glenlivet. The 12 year old may be boring/ bland but it is at least honest marketing and is dependable when seen at a bar when nothing else appeals.

I have one bottle of the 16 in stock and it will be opened to enjoy on a special night just hope to find a suitable replacement.

7 years ago 0

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

I have @Talexander to thank for not buying an NAS sherry Nadurra. I tried it at his house and will not buy it.

7 years ago 0

@Ol_Jas
Ol_Jas commented

The only connection between these current NAS Nadurras and the classic 16-year-old is branding.

They're unrelated whiskies that marketing people are trying to create associations among in our minds.

7 years ago 0

@talexander
talexander commented

I actually liked this quite a bit - but the marketing of it is so way over the top it's practically insulting.

7 years ago 0

@Victor
Victor commented

71 points from @MaltActivist and 90 from @talexander: splendid cognitive dissonance. Now I am eager for a taste of Glenlivet Cipher. I do not expect to buy a bottle of it though, even if it is sold at half the $ 123 average world price.

7 years ago 0

@talexander
talexander commented

@Victor If you can, try it at a bar....sadly, I don't have any more that I can provide to you as a sample.

7 years ago 0

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in