First published at Words on Whisky.
I was privileged a few weeks ago to attend the launch of Pride 1981, the new glittering gem in the Glenmorangie crown. I say privileged because at R30 000 per bottle, and with only 1000 bottles available worldwide (and – at this stage – only one in South Africa), I am destined to be amongst the rare few ever to taste this whisky. It’s my guess that this is a big part of what Pride is about: making people feel special.
I can, with little persuasion, wax lyrical about this wonderful whisky and I will be doing so. It is without a doubt magnificent. But, let’s not deny it, its single most remarkable attribute, jumping out at you suddenly like sixteen men in the dark Scottish night, is its price. It’s bloody expensive. Insanely expensive! But then any whisky costing what I’d anticipate spending to refurbish a bathroom seems excessive to me. Sadly, I’m simply not in this league…or anywhere near it for that matter. Nevertheless, in the pursuit of objectivity, to give Pride and its hefty price tag a fair shake, I decided to cast myself in the role of a realistic potential buyer. As a suave Bugatti driving, supermodel dating, beachfront habitating, yacht sailing, island owning, whisky loving billionaire, would Pride get me reaching for my Hermes wallet?
To answer this question I had evaluate how the whisky stacks up against its peers. This required a little twenty-first century window shopping (Windows browsing?). Strap yourselves in.
I based my review on an analysis of the following criteria:
Style and scarcity – Pride is a vintage, single malt Scotch whisky. This means that all of the liquid used in the bottling of Pride was distilled in the same year, specifically 1981. The typical single malt will usually combine whiskies of different ages from distillations having occurred in different years. This is done to ensure consistency of flavour from bottling to bottling. Vintage whiskies are unique in flavour, and usually very limited in quantity, hence they attract a premium. Pride – with a release of 1000 1L bottles - is indeed limited, but not really limited enough to justify its price. Other heavyweights punching in this class – such as the Dalmore 1974 Aurora and the Talisker 1973 – were limited to 200 and 100 70cl bottles respectively, so considerably more exclusive. It should also be noted that many of Pride’s contemporaries are single casks, a style that appears to command an additional premium. I personally don’t see the justification. In commercial terms a vintage is by definition equivalent to a single cask (or maybe not: I guess there’s always the possibility of releasing more of a vintage, whereas once a single cask is done, it’s done). Whichever, the fact is that these further diminish Pride’s claims on the basis of this criterion. If we were to stop the analysis here this wouldn’t seem to be such a clever purchase.
Age – Older whiskies are typically more expensive. Pride is a 28 year old whisky, old but not that old. There are equivalent and older whiskies available which represent much better value for money purely given their age. For instance I came across a Glenlivet 1965 – a 40 year old whisky - at £999. Pride at the same outlet sells for £2450.
ABV – Ok, so now the momentum starts to swing. Cask strength generally fetches more than standard bottling strength, because it’s the undiluted real deal. Pride, at a whopping 56.7%, would significantly stretch my billionaire persona’s per bottle drinking pleasure.
Volume – Pride is bottled in litres. That warrants a bottle price of up to 43% more than if it were 70cl.
Brand – Glenmorangie is single malt aristocracy, and it should be priced accordingly. It is the natural order that a prince would be ransomed at a higher price than a peasant. Sorry, that's just the way it is.
Packaging – Ultra-premium products are intended to impress, and packaging has a big part to play in this regard. Pride has some of the most elaborate packaging that I’ve ever seen in the category - the Baccarat crystal decanter and the cantilevered box set a new standard.
At this stage I was still hesitant. There may after all be no need to reach into the pocket of my Saville Row suit. One important bit of information was still to be considered however, and here’s where Pride really comes into its own.
Maturation – Pride is double-matured, having been accommodated for the latter iteration, a duration of some 10 years, in some very special Sauternes casks from the legendary Chateau D’Yquem vineyards. I doubt that there’s anything out there that’s even remotely similar. To make the matter even more compelling double-maturation (and the specific instance of it known as finishing) is unusual in older whiskies. I’m guessing that as a whisky ages there’s increasingly more value at stake, and it becomes less and less sensible to fool around with it. High risk deserves high rewards. Once I’d taken into account this interesting, highly unusual ageing process and the exceptional casks in which it was executed there was only one possible conclusion: Pride is a standout.
It is this alone - the quality and rarity of its maturation – that seals the deal. It might be expensive, but justifiably so.
Now that that’s settled onto the whisky itself. I’ll keep my musings down to two impressions:
Firstly, this is a rich, intense whisky. It is magnetic, commanding of attention, all-consuming. It brooks no distractions. Perhaps it was the hype, perhaps the dramatic pre-amble, or even the knowledge that this would be my first and last dram of Pride, whatever it was, and I believe that the flavour had no small part to play, I was fixated on it with single-minded focus, drawn to it like a moth to a flame. The experience was almost spiritual.
Secondly, the fruity, jammy, treacly flavours reminded me, quite strikingly, of a delicious, dense, dried-fruit compote that was part of my Mom’s culinary repertoire back in the day. I was transported to my youth as I nosed and sipped, and nursed the precious dregs. All that was missing was the “crème à la vanille” by which that compote was usually accompanied. Mmm, I’m licking my lips as I’m writing this…
The long and short of it, as I mentioned at the beginning of the post, is that Pride is magnificent. If you’ve got the dough then I strongly recommend that you don’t miss the show. If you don’t got the dough, then you may want to try Nectar D’Or, the budget version of Pride, 10 year old Glenmorangie Original finished in Sauternes casks for some 2 years, a fine whisky that I’ve often enjoyed, but poured for me immediately after my dram of Pride had expired it lacked its usual lustre. How easy it is to become accustomed to the finer things…
PS: I don't believe in quantitative reviews so I will not be scoring the whisky. The neutral score of 75/100 indicated means that I've ignored this section.
Very interesting review and commentary, @Indy. On the WWW forum, there was a thread about the Pride bottling that covered various angles to the 'relevance' of luxury bottlings. One approach that I took in that discussion is that people who may not be whisky drinkers/collectors specifically, would/could purchase this bottle as a work of art. The intricate design of the bottling that you alluded to is quite striking and, if the whisky is seen as part of the 'medium', the container and liquid could be quite easily displayed by someone with the financial means to acquire it for the sake of art...of course, as your review nicely points out, the beauty of the whisky itself would be lost!
Hello @Indy and welcome to Whisky Connosr. What a engaging and detailed review, very enjoyable!
I understand that you don't like to rate the whisky but the site doesn't currently provision for 'no score', I wonder if there is a better solution than giving it 1/100 which in the grand scheme of things is penalising the whisky unduly.
Perhaps giving it a neutral score - for example 75/100 - with the same caveat might be an option?