Whisky Connosr
Menu
Buy Whisky Online

Bruichladdich 16 Year Old 1992 Cuvee E The Sixteens

Little Apples

0 384

@markjedi1Review by @markjedi1

3rd Jan 2014

0

Bruichladdich 16 Year Old 1992 Cuvee E The Sixteens
  • Nose
    ~
  • Taste
    ~
  • Finish
    ~
  • Balance
    ~
  • Overall
    84

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

Bruichladdich has a couple of 16 year old casks that they finished on different types of wine casks: Cuvee A on Chateau Lafitte, Cuvee B on Chateau Latour, Cuvee C on Chateau Margaux, Cuvee D on Chateau Haut-Brion, Cuvee E on Chateau d’Yquem and Cuvee F on Chateau Lafleur. Wine finishes, in my opinion, are always a bit tricky. That is why I will limit myself at this time to the Cuvee E, which is said to be the best among them. Chateau d’Yquem means Sauternes, the sweet dessert wine.

I am immediately treated to apples and pears, but also apricots and green banana, on this very sweet nose. Furthermore some great hints of coconut, mandarin and honey. Soft spices, led by cinnamon. After a few moments, some sweet and sour apples are dominating. Fresh and stimulating.

It is very, very soft on the palate. Quite waxy. The coastal elements are present (hints of smoke, sweet peat and a midly salty edge), but the sweetness easily wins. Honey, cinnamon, touch of vanilla but mostly baskets full of little apples.

In the long, drying finish I get some green tea and a bit of pepper.

Pleasant enough, without being great.

Related Bruichladdich reviews

3 comments

Anxyous commented

Unfortunately, this bottle is impossible to find anywhere at any price.... One can only dream. Thanks for the review!

10 years ago 0

@MaltActivist
MaltActivist commented

I have this one lying around for a while. I think I need a theme before I can put it in a lineup. What do you suggest?

And TFTR

(TFTR = Thanks For The Review)

10 years ago 0

@markjedi1
markjedi1 commented

Cheers! You can put it either in a Laddie line-up or a wine finished whiskies line-up. I will come out best in the second one, imho.

10 years ago 0