Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Johnnie Walker Blenders' Batch Wine Cask Finish

"A pour decision at the whine bar"

1 276

@cricklewoodReview by @cricklewood

24th May 2018

0

Johnnie Walker Blenders' Batch Wine Cask Finish
  • Nose
    ~
  • Taste
    ~
  • Finish
    ~
  • Balance
    ~
  • Overall
    76

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

This set of reviews are from the last in-store tasting I attended in early April. I arrived a bit later which meant it was less crowded and I could take my sweet ass time taking notes and somewhat antisocial.

First whisky of the night was this Blenders' Batch edition. I believe there are 3 or 4 of these featuring different finishes or highlighting the grains used.

The Diageo blab says it supposed to be 10± years old, despite being NAS, relying on malt from Clynelish and grain from Cameronbridge.

Nose: a fair amount of sulfur, loads of vanilla, sour fruit and oak. A touch of damp earthy peat, wet cardboard, cooked fruits.

Palate: red fruits, currants, cherry, creamy vanilla. Then malty, bread, it's fairly hot on the arrival. Marzipan, cardboard, sour fruits, like summer pudding left out in sun and fermenting. Lots of oak present throughout.

Finish: it's limp watery, keeps on with the burn and sour oak/jam

Many people raved about this at the tasting, surprised by how much they liked it and "for the price" they kept saying. There are some aspects that I liked but it felt messy overall, maybe in cocktails but I still don't see what makes this specifically a JW product. Maybe I'm taking this too seriously or perhaps I'm just not the intended consumer for this product.

Related Johnnie Walker reviews

2 comments

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

Great review. I feel like I wrote it and I didn't have to taste it...

5 years ago 0

@cricklewood
cricklewood commented

@Nozinan, thanks, I thought of you when people kept saying that is was good for the price laughing definitely not worth using your liver's allocation on.

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in