Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Lagavulin Locomotive breath

This smoky almost made me puke...

3 1182

@GeorgyReview by @Georgy

21st Sep 2017

1

Lagavulin Locomotive breath
  • Nose
    ~
  • Taste
    ~
  • Finish
    ~
  • Balance
    ~
  • Overall
    82

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

This is a perfect example of how uncontrolled peat and smoke can really screw up your enjoyment. Folks who enjoy big, in your face smoke will love this, since this whisky is like an essential oil of all things barbecue.

NOSE: sulfur, bacon, smoked paprika, barbecue sauce, ketchup, all that good stuff, burned wood. Brown sugar. Caramelized onions. Smoke, smoke. Cigar ash. Some familiar sweet sherry notes appear. As it breathed, it also demonstrated incredible fruitiness. Delicious thick peach jam. With water: waters puts out the fire and reveals another layer to this whisky: which is rounded, sweet, hints of Christmas cake, a hint of porto, some sweet berry jam as well with vanilla. Even more water reveals more of those sherry notes. 24/25

TASTE: (without water) burned everything: sweet and sour sauce, sweet, barbeque sauce, with charred meat, charred onions, covered with burned bits of bacon, and ashes from the barbeque. Damp socks. Incredibly intense. It’s a good thing I can experience barbeque without actually eating meat. But it’s so intense, it’s even a little bit repulsive. (with water): the foundation is sweet and lovely, but it’s still full of bacon grease, burned meat and smoke. It’s really not nice and overpowering. I love peaty and smoky whiskies, mind you. But this one is really too much for me. 19/25

FINISH: more of that nasty damp socks over a put out barbecue grill. Everything burnt. 19/25

BALANCE: 19/25 Balance here is really not in place, since you'd never expect something so delicious to turn out to be so overwhelmingly smoky with all those really in your face notes. It's like singing the entire "Love me tender" by Elvis at the top of your voice. It wouldn't sound good. This whisky is way too loud, even for Islay.

Related Lagavulin reviews

11 comments

@MadSingleMalt
MadSingleMalt commented

This is the most interesting review I've read in a long time. On one hand, it sounds really delicious to me despite all your warnings. On the other, I have had a couple smoky whiskies that were just "too much" to be good. Never an Islay though; those two nasties were Balcones Brimstone and Lost Spirits Leviathan.

So what's the deal with this thing? Abnormally high peating? Deliberately crazy cask? Luck of the draw?

6 years ago 1Who liked this?

@Victor
Victor commented

Thanks, @Georgy!

Why is it that a review like this seems almost irresistible to so many whisky buffs? Maybe because many have not experienced what they would consider to be too much smoke, or too much peat. Inquiring minds want to know. Inquiring psyches want to have had the experience.

@Georgy, is there any more information about this one, age, cask types, etc.? Who bottled it? Also, was it plainly stated/labeled to be from Lagavulin, or was that an inference?

6 years ago 3Who liked this?

@Georgy
Georgy commented

@Victor It says sherry cask finish and that there are only 120 bottles of this stuff in the world. JWWW for Canada.

It doesn't say it's Lagavulin, but a lot of folks who have sampled from this bottle have come to the conclusion that it just has to be it, since it's so similar in character. I may be mistaken, but I hear that independent bottlings of Lagavulin are very few and far between, so who knows, it could be just one of those rare ones. Considering the fact that there are only 120 bottles of this stuff, it sure is rare.

6 years ago 0

@Georgy
Georgy commented

@Victor and @MadSingleMalt Speaking of too much peat and smoke...let's put it this way. If you have your standard Lagavulin 16 on hand, pour yourself a dram, then, maybe, add a wee bit of Talisker 57* North (it will add more saltiness and increase ABV). Now, take a sniff. Nice, isn't it? Peaty and smoky. Don't drink it as yet!! NOW! Take a little bit of ash from your smoking friends and add it to the dirty roasting tray in which you home-barbecued a piece of meat with onions, garlic, a lot of smoked paprika, celery, all covered in crispy bacon bits, some of which got burned in the process. You ate all of that meat, but now you are left with the fond (that caramelized and a little bit burned goodness stuck to the bottom of that tray). You go to your bathroom and you take out your stinky socks you began to wash by hand in a big bucket of water with that cheap alkali soap. You take a little bit of that water and go straight to the kitchen. Now heat up the tray again and deglaze all that fond with that stinky soapy water. Reduce all the remaining liquid down as much as you can to concentrate the flavors. Pour the delicious "sauce" into you dram and now you can enjoy it!

...that's why I say it's too much)

6 years ago 1Who liked this?

@Georgy
Georgy commented

@MadSingleMalt I also assume that this one is a combination of very young, very naughty smoky whisky with some older sherry brothers to balance it out. Smoke, from what I've heard and experienced, tends to subside as time goes by, so this one definitely not a single cask whisky.

6 years ago 1Who liked this?

@BlueNote
BlueNote commented

@Georgy It sounds more like 62 than 82 points.

6 years ago 1Who liked this?

@Alexsweden
Alexsweden commented

Thank you, it's not that often that a whisky that is too much really is too much, if you know what I mean. The Sherry solist for example is "too much" but still very enjoyable. This one seems to land at the wrong end of the spectrum. Did anyone else enjoy it?

6 years ago 0

@Georgy
Georgy commented

@Alexsweden I guess somebody did enjoy it, since a lot of people wanted to take a dram of this stuff home. And I do see how this may be something that people can enjoy. It's just not for me. It's way too intense.

6 years ago 0

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

@Alexsweden The Deanston 10 PX finish is a little too much sherry. Sometimes you can have too much of a good thing.

6 years ago 1Who liked this?

@MadSingleMalt
MadSingleMalt commented

@Nozinan , everything in moderation, including moderation.

@Georgy , I bet your detailed "socks & bacon" recipe was their second choice for a bottle title, but "Locomotive Breath" just edged it out.

I would like to know how they made this thing. You speculate about various ages and caskings, but then it's only 120 bottles, and then you guess that's it not a single cask. So some kind of weird vatting, of which they only packaged 120 bottles' worth? Curious and curiouser!

6 years ago 1Who liked this?

@Victor
Victor commented

Obviously with a multiple cask bottling of only 120 total bottles this must be composed of all 50 year old whisky. :-)

6 years ago 1Who liked this?

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in