quirkzoo started a discussion
14 years ago
Discussions
0 3
14 years ago
Use the filters above to search this discussion.
Yeah I saw this one, it's been all over Twitter. At the risk of taking it a bit too seriously - it's slightly misleading to call it a single malt, no? They even state that "once fermented into a clear alcohol spirit, whisky blends are added to give colour".
The connection to the urine is pretty much irrelevant when it is extracted at a molecular level. Pure sugar is just sugar, no matter where it comes from.
A funny (if not a little unsettling) story and quite typical of Wired.
14 years ago 0
@LeFrog I believe it to be a hoax, as the article also claimed the pissky (for lack of a better word) would be shown (and tasted) at the Materials 2010 event in London, but when looking over their list of exhibitors, it was nowhere to be found. It's - at the very best - a work of art (comparable to Belgian artist Wim Delvoye's 'Cloaca' - aka the sh*t machine). Much ado about nothing.
14 years ago 0
@quirkzoo Oh, not to mention the legal impossibility to call this whisky of course, for whisky needs to be a distillate of grain, not gran (I read the artist uses urine from his grandmother as well, yikes!)
14 years ago 0
Anyone else come across this article "Pissky" about making whisky using the high sugar content of elderly diabetic urine?
wired.co.uk/news/archive/…
Anyone dare try some?