Whisky Connosr
Shop Join

Macallan Sienna 1824 Series

No need for colors

0 1084

@MaltActivistReview by @MaltActivist

7th Jul 2015


  • Nose
  • Taste
  • Finish
  • Balance
  • Overall

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

I have had the pleasure of sitting across Mr Bob Dalgarno, the famed Macallan Whisky Maker, for an interview and a subsequent tasting and I have to admit I was left with nothing but admiration for the man.

The painstaking process he undergoes to ensure that all his whiskies are created from careful barrel selection and put together to maintain consistency in taste and color is truly an art form.

Which is why I'm pretty sure it was the sales and marketing team and not Bob him self who felt that the right way forward for Macallan was to base their entry level whiskies on the basis of color.

Stupidest thing I've heard in my life.

They spend an entire lifetime trying to tell people that color means nothing, and it does not. Then they come and do the exact opposite because they've run out of ideas to market their whiskies by convincing people that darker whiskies are better whiskies.

Look I know stocks are dwindling. Whisky makers and blenders have to start innovating and thinking of new ways to market their whiskies to travel retail. I get that. But to take something as superfluous as color as a sign of quality is surely a great disservice to the patrons of the industry, is it not?

Oh, well. The Bentley needs regular maintenance doesn't it?

This 1824 travel retail series has four color expressions - Gold, Amber, Sienna & Ruby - each one darker than the previous one. Each one more expensive than the previous one.

The Sienna (the second most-expensive and second darkest whisky in the range) is, obviously, a Non Age Statement and is a mix of first and second fill European and American sherry casks. My sample is from a brand new bottle and served at 43%

Nose: Butter. Sherry. Nutmeg. Raisins. Hint of oak. Touch mossy. Like bung cloth. Let it sit and the vanilla comes through. Sponge cake. Cinnamon. Green apples. Touch of chocolate. Light hay. Quite a non-descript nose. Starts off smelling creamy but then thins out a bit. (21/25)

Palate : Medium bodied. Oily. Tastes of raw spirit a little. Cake. Nutmeg. Coffee. Those green apples again. Vanilla. Nutmeg. Hint of oak. Sherry. Dark fruits. It's not the best palate I've tasted. Something raw and harsh about it even after 30 minutes of breathing. (21/25)

Finish : Absolutely nothing at first.Pufffff and gone. Very flat. But comes back after a while. Slowly warms your chest cavity and your mouth. Cocoa beans. Coffee. Quite malty. (21/25)

I guess there's two types of people. The 99% that are reasonably fond of whisky and not very judgemental or critical. And that's fine and I hold nothing against them.

Then there's you and me who get upset because this once great brand has resorted to cheap tactics like this.

I get it. Greatness can't be purchased at the duty free. But it still irks me when brands don't even try.

Related Macallan reviews


Victor commented

Great review, @MaltActivist, as usual. Thanks very much.

I've been wondering about these Macallan colour-named whiskies, but I have not been motivated to buy any of them. It may be awhile before Macallan establishes a new equilibrium with its no-age-statement lines. And I wonder, "Will there ever again be high quality Macallan sold at a good value for money?"

2 years ago 0

paddockjudge commented

@MaltActivist, I thought pole dancers were the inspiration for naming the 1824 Series. Hmmm, the colour progression had escaped me;)

2 years ago 0

MaltActivist commented

@Victor I think you've done the right thing. Something unfair about plonking $300 for a whisky that is simply darker than the rest. I'm having serious doubts that Macallan will ever produce anything worth us mortals buying (like the 10, 12, 18 Sherry Oak)

@paddockjudge I'm pretty sure you're right. I'm guessing one evening spent at The Spearmint Rhino in Vegas would do that.

2 years ago 0

BigJoe commented

My thoughts are against the grain here. From what I understand the 1824 series is a replacement to meet demand. I guess there were two options, hike the price hugely to slow sales, or move to a NAS line and free up some younger spirit to maintain supply to the growing demand. Obviously they went for the second option to keep bottles on the shelves. Now it simply wouldn't do to replace the previous line with lower age statements because people simply wouldn't buy it at the same price point. I think it is very clever work from the marketing team two base it on colour, even though they can only be compared within the same series. Obviously with sherry finished whisky without artificial colour added - the longer its aged the darker it will be. Obviously there are many factors that influence whisky colour and thats why it can not be compared to other whisky outside the 1824 series. for example you can not compare the colour of sherry finish to bourbon as the bourbon will be lighter etc.

Wouldn't it be great if there was a flow on effect to others in the industry to abandon artificial colouring and let the colour tell you something about the product? A very long way off but I'm sure I'm not the only one who can appreciate natural colour in a whisky.

Just my thoughts on it, like I said, against the grain. I accept what they have done here.

2 years ago 0

Nozinan commented


I would have to say that while you may be against the grain, many others are moving TOWARD grains such as corn and rye, and away from the weak NAS malts that are being flogged.

2 years ago 0

Benancio commented

@MaltActivist insightful review, thx. I use to drink a lot of Macallan 12y, stopped 5 years ago, wish I still had an old bottle. loved the Cask strength, but I haven't seen it in a few years. Both were great and affordable.

Your not alone getting upset with high priced lower quality NAS scotch. I almost refuse to buy NAS scotch.

2 years ago 0

BigJoe commented

@Nozinan 'Against the grain' was referring to a differing opinion and was not intended to be literally interpreted as having anything to do with grain whiskies.

2 years ago 0

Ol_Jas commented

That's why his joke was funny.

2 years ago 0

Nozinan commented


It was a joke, a play on words, I really wasn't commenting too carefully on your post. Hope I didn't offend.

2 years ago 0

BigJoe commented

@Nozinan that makes sense, I didn't get that it was a joke. Carry on

2 years ago 0

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in