Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Wiser's Dissertation

What's up, doc?

4 688

@NozinanReview by @Nozinan

31st May 2017

1

Wiser's Dissertation
  • Nose
    ~
  • Taste
    ~
  • Finish
    ~
  • Balance
    ~
  • Overall
    88

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

Dr. Don Livermore (no references to my ultrasound joke like last time…oops) asserts that Canadian whisky’s strength is in its flexibility and versatility. Sadly I only have undergraduate degrees so I can’t comment on that.

What I CAN comment on is the whisky rumoured to have been created as a result of his phD research, and released as part of the “rare cask series”. All the bottle tells me is that it’s rye forward and its rich flavours are due to the quality of the barrels. It's NAS with no mention of chill filtration or colour, and when I last met the good doctor @paddockjudge forbade me to ask such pedestrian questions. It’s bottled at 46.1% which is the rounded up molecular weight of ethanol (46.06844 g/mol), and this fact is not in any way originally mine.

I bought this bottle today and decided I’d better open it before it is relegated to the back of the “to try” line, so that I know if I want to get a second bottle.

This expression is reviewed in my usual manner, covering and allowing it to settle after which I take my nosing and tasting notes. No water in my Canadian whiskies.


Nose:

In the Glencairn, fruity, green apples, light syrup, vanilla. Butterscotch? Very clean. The snifter seems to concentrate the alcohol a bit more, and the syrup and apple are more intense. The bourbon glass emphasises more middle range aromas, and the alcohol and fruit are less intense. A hint of freshly cut granny smith apple peeks through. I really like this nose! 23/25

Taste:

Glencairn - Sweet on the arrival and dry through the development. Caramel, vanilla, not overly complex. Where’s the fruit? Very “Canadian”. The flavour is fruitier, spicier and livelier from the snifter and a little muted in the bourbon glass. 22/25

Finish:

Very astringent, rye spices remain. 21.5/25

Balance:

The nose promises one thing and the taste is something very different. 21.25

Score: 88 /100


I make note that I scored this the same as Last Barrels. I think I like this one better, though one day I may do a H2H2H and include Union 52. If this were bottled at cask strength it would easily be in the 90s. I see things are creeping up (46.1%), which I hope is the next step in a trend towards fuller flavour Canadian spirits.

Interestingly (or not, I’ll let you decide for yourselves), I can’t decide if I prefer this one in a Glencairn or a snifter. I think it’s not really meant for the bourbon glass. I think I’ll give this one to the snifter.

Related Wiser's reviews

6 comments

@JasonHambrey
JasonHambrey commented

I don't know if I could handle this one at CS. I find it pretty intense - I love it; but it is a slow sipper for me. It's one I love a dram of, but it overloads my senses....

Barrels were filled in 2004/2005. So it's about 12 years old.

PS, if anyone is interested in reading some great stuff on Canadian whisky, Livermore's thesis is pretty cool (but perhaps that appeals to the scientist in me...)

6 years ago 0

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

@JasonHambrey

I agree there's a lot of flavour. I'm just tasting the rest of the pour I made for the review, and 5-6 days later it's still great.

I think I'd still prefer to know the CS taste and then water it down to my own preference, but I also understand that it might end up a very different beast.

I'd be interested in reading his thesis sometime on a long flight...

6 years ago 0

@Nelom
Nelom commented

@Nozinan wrote:

I'd be interested in reading his thesis sometime on a long flight...

You can download it here:

www.ros.hw.ac.uk/handle/10399/2591

It's on my "to read" pile. We'll see if I ever get around to it. Even if I do, I suspect there'll be a lot of skimming, as having looked through it briefly I know there's quite a bit of chemistry that's way over my head.

6 years ago 0

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

@Nelom It's 287 pages on the pdf I created... It better be a LONG flight.

6 years ago 0

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

Last night I came back to this... to enjoy, not to study. I found the nose had a much more floral nature and both it and the palate had a greater complexity than before.

Would be great if this could become a standard release so I wouldn't need to worry about stocking up.

6 years ago 0

@Nozinan
Nozinan commented

I was coming back to this one tonight to see if U want to pursue extra bottles before they are gone. Bottle is about 80% full.

I find it's a lot more fruity than before. I'm really enjoying it.

I'm just tasting it with water and it does seem to open up nicely. Something to pursue further, I think.

I thought I would copy and past (not plagiarism as I'm citing the source) my H2H2H notes from my Union 52 review so it would be on all three of the reviews of the three I compared:

I note that I’ve scored each of the Wiser’s special releases 88/100, so the only thing I can do is try them H2H2H, all three in a standard Glencairn.

Nose:

I have to give this one to the Dissertation. It has a fruity quality (something sweet, tropical and slightly over-ripe) which mingles with its syrupiness. The Last Barrels has a stronger nose but there’s something just slightly off tonight, sour milk? U52 comes in a little softer than the Last Barrels, but a little nicer.

Taste:

The dissertation attacks the palate with rich spiciness, the Last Barrels is less fruity and spicy and has that umami quality I mentioned in my review, and [see above for tasting notes on U52]. Again I’ll go with the dissertation first and the U52 second.

So in a triple head to head I think my favourite of the three is the Dissertation.

6 years ago 1Who liked this?

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in