Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Laphroaig 25 Year Old

Average score from 5 reviews and 12 ratings 91

Laphroaig 25 Year Old

Product details

  • Brand: Laphroaig
  • Bottler: Distillery Bottling
  • ABV: 40.0%
  • Age: 25 year old

Shop for this

What next?

  • Add to cabinet
  • Add to wish list
@Pierre_W
Laphroaig 25 Year Old

This is the first 25-year old Laphroaig, released in 2007. It was matured in both ex-bourbon barrels and second-fill ex-Oloroso sherry puncheons that were handpicked by master blender Robert Hicks.

The first thing I get on the nose is smoke - no surprise there - but rather subdued, followed by a good dose of vanilla and a hint of lemons. Then there are flavours of sherry and dark fruits such as prunes, figs and dates. Next, notes of cardboard and furniture polish develop. Overall, this is a well balanced and very enticing nose.

The palate is light-bodied, oily and lightly spicy. Vanilla flavours again come first, followed by caramel and wood spice. The peat is there, very well integrated and getting counterbalanced with sherry sweetness.

The finish is long and smoky. Seaweed is now the dominant flavour, together with cardboard.

This 25-year old is a very nice Laphroaig, for sure. I loved the nose that is really well balanced and nicely complex. The palate however would benefit a lot from a higher ABV - why this was bottled at only 40% beats me. Overall verdict: lovely nose and very well balanced but without much impact, especially on the palate.

@RianC, I imagine that you have read on this site that all of the standard Laphroaig 10 sold in North America, i.e. Canada and the USA, is at the 43% ABV strength.

Another point with 25 yo Laphroaig being bottled at 40%: this might not be so very far from the Cask Strength. I reviewed the 2013 release 25 yo Laphroaig Cask Strength. Cask Strength in that case was 45.1% ABV.

connosr.com/laphroaig-25-yo-cask-strength-…

In the case of the 2013 CS release 45% ABV seemed completely adequate. But no, I would not have wanted it watered down to 40%.

@Victor - good point and I thought that may have something to do with it but at least bottle it at CS even if that's 41%.

I know about your 43% abv's as well . . . is abv envy a thing? It should be wink

@Onibubba

The 2nd Nashville Whisky Festival began promptly at 6PM. I was first through the door, and eagerly sought out my first dram. The first table I encountered was Laphroaig, and that's where I found my "date" for the evening - Laphroaig 25, 2011. This is a bottle that I have been lusting after for some time, and I did indulge.

Nose is unmistakeably Laphroaig. It is briney and medicinal - not as intense as the younger whiskies, but moreso than the 18. Taste has some vanilla sweetness, but little wood. Very bright and vibrant. Zesty. Very full and rich in the mouth. Not drying in the least.

This was a very rich and comforting whisky, one that I kept coming back to through out the night.

Laphroaig 25 is great, but would I buy a bottle? I tasted this side by side with the 18. The 25 surpassed it in every way. BUT, both tasted like Laphroaig. Does that make sense? The 25 was easily the better whisky, but it was just a tuned up version of the 18. If it was 50-100 dollars more, I might feel like grabbing a bottle. But it is not. It is 350.00 more than the 18.

I cannot justify paying that much more money for something I would only rate a few points higher than the other. I am glad I had the experience to sample these whiskies side by side.

@Onibubba: Went on sale in Oregon for only $140 on Monday. I would have had to drive to the beach (about 1.5 hours away) so I passed. What a deal though! I had gone to the beach a week earlier. Had I known the OLCC was going to put that bottle on sale, I would have planned my vacation around it! Of course, instead, I stocked up on even older bottles. Check out my collection. It's getting sick! The Lonachs are old, but the ABV's are too low. Still, they are fun to own. Hope you are happy and well these days, Onibubba. Take care, Rig.

@paddockjudge, thanks for the excellent information! You have explained a lot, there. Both Wiser's Legacy and Wiser's Red Letter are aged long periods in new oak. That says most of what needs to be said in my opinion. The new oak flavours are to me even more obvious in Legacy than in the 2007 Red Letter.

One question: is some or all of the rye in Legacy and Red Letter malted?

My thanks to @whiskyjoe for having recently given me a new bottle of Wiser's Legacy. This is a whisky I hope to always have on hand.

@MaltActivist

I'm generally a fan of anything Laphroaig and the distillery has never let me down in all these years, though, I've heard of a miscreant 15 year old that may taint an otherwise perfect track record. But let's cross that bridge when we get to it.

Right. The 25 year old 2011 Cask Strength. Possibly the most un-Laphroaig nose you will ever find. Which is not necessarily a bad thing. The iodine and peat is subdued; it's there but comes to you in gentle waves riding on a crest of sweet lemon citrus. The citrus is then enveloped in a fine spray of honey and sugarcane. This is possibly the most delicate of Laphroaig noses you will ever come across.

The lemon and honey are dominant on the palate but not before a burst of white pepper greets your tongue. The peat and smoke, as on the nose, play a supporting role as if to nudge you from time to time and let you know this is an Islay.

The finish is long, dry and spicy with a touch of oak and a smattering of nuts.

This is a lovely dram and does all the right things but the question remains; should Laphroaig be producing such delicate whiskies or focus on mouthfuls of iodine, peat and personality?

I'll let you decide.

This was one I just couldn't get at all. Maybe I was expecting Laphroaig and it's not as you point at. Maybe I was expecting something so great considering the obscene price tag, but it was the biggest let down I've ever experienced drinking scotch and I'm usually pretty easy...like almost everything, and tend to rate higher than others. Possibly this was an inferior bottle as I felt it was average at best...82-85, remember it tasting flat, somewhat lifeless.

I haven't tried the 18. The 25 was very good and smooth, but far from a classic Laphroaig - not enough peat and smoke for me. I found the 2012 Cairdeas Origin much more to my liking at a fraction of the price, with the lemony citrus notes added to the classic Laph profile, and very smooth. I'll choose it over the 25 regardless of price!

@Gold

I think this is perhaps as close to whisky perfection as anything I have ever drunk, over two decades. Of course, the young(er) fiery peaty smoky Islay charmer is there, but, with a supple yet significant veneer of complexity which comes from maturation over a longer period in sherry and also bourbon barrels. There is sweetness, honey, and freshness, and also magnificent burnished peaty, briny notes, as one would hope for. Adding a little water opens up this marriage of styles even more. It is the best expression of this whisky style I have ever tasted. Expensive, yes, much better to drink than the much vaunted (and much more expensive still) 30 year old Laphroaig. Try to find a generous friend with a bottle and a willingness to share a dram with you !

@Kutter

I tasted this magnificent dram at a whisky event in Boston poured by Simon, the brand ambassador of the East Cost. It is the second event that Simon has served me this dram. And it is the second time that it wins the crown of the best dram of the evening.

Nose: Apple and pears at first. Then the peat is still there (more than in the 18 yo) with some sweet notes that give a very very nice mix. very smooth and complex

Mouth: All in apples with some smoky peat. Again very smooth, it is like tasting a liquorish nectar.

Finale: very very long and sweet

Balance: one of the best, nothing goes out, everything in there work as a team. For me, it is like the Montreal Canadians of 1993... they worked as a team and there was a lot of overtime wins !

Great review! I was lucky enough to sample this recently at the Whisky Show in London, and really enjoyed it, certainly one of the standouts. I just wish it was more affordable so i could buy a bottle!

I bought a few bottles based on your review and, having tried some, completely agree - what an experience! I actually prefer the original 40% bottling to the cask strength versions (although having said that the cask strength is also lovely). Cheers.

Popular Laphroaig whiskies