Whisky Connosr
Menu
Shop Join

Redbreast 12 Year Old Cask Strength

Average score from 14 reviews and 28 ratings 90

Redbreast 12 Year Old Cask Strength

Product details

Shop for this

What next?

  • Add to cabinet
  • Add to wish list
@RianC
Redbreast 12 Year Old Cask Strength

Sample courtesy of @wierdo - thanks again!

I found myself in the fairly unusual place of having two separate batches of the same whiskey open when I got this. I did a head to head with the B1-17 version prior to the review and did find some differences -both were lovely though, it must be said. So it's about time I gave this one the sole attention it probably deserves.

A wee splash of water was added.

Nose - A little sharpness from the alcohol at first but this leads into creamy vanilla, butterscotch (Werther's), a mix of baking spices (some cardamom, big clove and a hint of nutmeg) and that gristy, slightly sour and metallic pot still note.

Taste - Bright and fresh with a 'sherberty' quality to the form. More butterscotch, tart green apples and lots more spice in the development with plenty of additional pepper.

Finish - Med - long. Some bold tannins and more of the pepper. Some sticky grain notes linger on the tongue.

Perhaps it's my palate this evening but there's a definite sense of the abv here that isn't quite as prominent in the earlier batch. Similarly, I'm getting little to no sense of any sherry maturation and I think it doesn't help. This is more 'golden' and brighter but less thick and unctuous, although there is definitely an oily, grainy aspect to it. Still very, very good whiskey but this one seems 'lesser' somehow. I'm also missing the new pencil notes that worked so well in the other batch.

@RianC Sounds like a major upgrade on the regular 12 which I thought was pretty mediocre and too sweet. Nice review, thanks.

Possibly less European oak than the other batch you preferred?

@markjedi1

Darn, the last time I tried this 12 years old Redbreast at cask strength was way back in 2012. But I recently got a sample from the Irish whiskey aficionado Benny, so I had no excuse to postpone this tasting session any longer. I have no reason to complain. It is a pot still whiskey, meaning that both malted and unmalted barley were used. It is vatting of both bourbon and sherry casks.

Lovely nose on tropical fruit with banana, pineapple and passionfruit in the lead, followed by a soft spiciness and some floral notes. I also get some pencil shavings and toasted oak. For a moment there it reminds me of a good grain whiskey, strangely enough.

Perfect mouthfeel. The tropical fruit returns, but is now partly overcome by lots of black pepper and vanilla. The alcohol let's itself be felt. All kinds of wood spices go hand in hand with candies pineapple, mashed banana and a truckload of caramel.

Very long finish on some oak, that pushes the fruit somewhat to the background. The woodspices linger very long.

This is very good stuff. Around 80 EUR. It is worth every penny. Having said that I did prefer the version from 2012.

@RianC

A very popular one this, so it would seem, and I had waited a good while after my pleasing experiences with the regular 12 to grab one of these and, yes, I'm glad I did!

Bottle's been open a couple of months and just passed the label. Review is neat.

Nose - immediately rich, creamy and buttery. Some sweet notes of red apples, rasiny, berry sherry influence and baking spices. There's quite a whiff of new pencils as well that integrates very well here. That unmistakable dry barley note and coppery twang are also present. Straightforward yet complex, if you get me?

Taste - Creamy again and really big on the palate with some more spice, butter, oak, a little liquorice, red fruits and Caramac bars. Dusty, almost grainy, yet rich and thick mouth-feel and perfectly balanced with it.

Finish - Long. Lots of spice, more toffee and oak with a little bitterness from the tannins at the death, but nothing is out of place. Some of the sherry influence hangs on in there as well and adds to the feeling of balance.

Water softens the edges a little but doesn't really change much other than diluting what's there. I prefer to drink this neat and savour the full sensations.

This is stunning Irish whiskey that deserves its solid reputation. One of those rare beasts that manages to be both quaffable yet powerful, rich, complex and rewarding at the same time. A total flavour bomb! That being said, I could get two bottles of the regular 12, with change, for one of these and I think that may be a better deal; which, in fairness, says more about the quality of the standard than this version per se.

Thanks for your review. This is one of those rare whiskies that seems to be enjoyed by just about everyone who tastes it.

I can’t say I was overly impressed with the standard 12. It was a bit too sweet and, dare I say it, smooth for my taste. Is the cask strength radically different and very much better?

@Pierre_W

Redbreast is one of the many whiskeys produced at New Midleton Distillery. It is a 'Single Pot Still' Irish whiskey, meaning that it is made from a mash of malted and unmalted barley. This 12-year old cask strength version appears to be the first ever release from 2011 (batch B1-11). It was triple distilled and matured in a combination of ex-sherry and ex-bourbon casks.

The nose is rich and fruity: strawberries and marzipan flavours come first, followed by a good dose of wood spice, vanilla, and buttercream. Quite minty. Then there is a touch of sherry, followed by some grassy notes.

The palate is medium-bodied and a bit spicy. The mint flavours are back, together with notes of oranges, grapefruits, and raisins. Later on there are cinnamon and biscuit flavours, followed by a hint of white pepper.

The finish is long and dry. No news on the flavour side: mint, cinnamon, and grass. Notes of apples and liquorice appear later on and last to the end.

This is an exceptional pot still whiskey, with a very complex nose and an equally complex palate. All these flavours are very well balanced, and despite the high ABV this can be easily drunk at cask strength. In my view adding water does not improve the flavour profile. Sadly, as I am not a big fan of mint flavours in whisk(e)y, this will not become a permanent fixture in my cabinet, but the quality of the spirit is unquestionably superb.

Nice review. I don't recall my batch (B1/15) having mint, so you may want to seek out later batches.

@Pierre_W, it is always wonderful to read your reviews. I do agree with @Nozinan that finding mint in Redbreast 12 Cask Strength seems to me like an outlier experience, and not something I have ever encountered in the 3 or so batches of Redbreast 12 CS from which I have sampled. (I would not want to taste mint in my Irish Whiskey either.) In other words, I would suggest that you sample RB12CS from another batch, and, if you find it minus the mint, which I expect, then you might in future consider owning another bottle of it.

@OdysseusUnbound

The following is a preview of a blog post I will be publishing on Wednesday

Irish Single Pot Still Whiskey has a reputation for being rich, oily and spicy. As far as I know, Redbreast is the best selling Single Pot Still in the world. Yet Irish whiskey doesn't get the adulation single malt scotch does. If your only experience with Irish whiskey is doing shots of Jameson on St. Patrick's Day the way Wayne, Squirrely Dan and Daryl shoot Gus N Bru on Letterkenny, you need to try some Single Pot Still. Bonus points if it's Cask Strength.

Tasting Notes

  • Nose (undiluted): surprisingly little alcohol burn, sweet fruits (apricots, figs), rich, sweet toffee, cinnamon buns
  • Palate (undiluted): rich arrival, very full-bodied, mouth-coating, more toffee, oranges, ginger, fresh dates, figs, a slight citrus note
  • Finish: Woah ! There's that Cask Strength alcohol burn. But the burn subsides fairly quickly and leaves rich brown sugar, buttered toast (malt biscuits?), and a nice oakiness. The sweetness lingers on quite a while.

Adding water really opens up this whiskey. It's still powerful (I dilute it to about 50%-52% ABV) yet the flavours become clearer. Freshly baked cinnamon buns with toffee come to mind. Or maybe it's caramel. I feel like there's a bit of a salty/briny note, but I'm not sure if it's there or if I'm imagining it. More orange and ginger. Rich, sweet dates on the finish remind us that this was aged entirely in first-fill Oloroso Sherry casks (if my Google-gleaned information is correct). This is simply terrific.

I find it impossible to say anything bad about this whiskey. Every time I have a tipple of it, I'm elated yet sad. The elation obviously stems from the glory of the whiskey, but the sadness stems from the stark and sudden realization that this bottle is a smidge less full than it formerly was. Nevertheless, I recommend this if you like rich, full flavours.

Love this stuff.

@talexander Interested. an inverted H2H (21 and 12) might be in order...

@Nozinan

I've very little experience with Irish Whiskey. A year an a half ago my political mentor and I opened a bottle of Writer's Tears, and I tasted a few here or there, but probably fewer than 5 different expressions.

I came across this a few weeks ago listed but not available at the LCBO. When it finally appeared at stores it seemed like it was flying off the shelves so I picked one up. I figured it would be great H2H with a Writer's Tears CS I have.

This one is 12 years old. It's been open 6 days, tasted 3-4 times, each time gassed. I reviewed in in my "usual manner", only I waited 20-30 minutes after the addition of water, a bit more than I usually do.


Nose:

Neat- Green fruits (granny smith apple), bright, fresh, light syrup, a slice of my mother’s apple pie when it’s still warm from the oven 22/25

With water – fruit is more mellow, sweet. Apple turnover, Honey. (23/25)

Taste :

Neat- Sweet / tart fruit hits me on the arrival, vanilla. Rich mouthfeel. Overpowering (in a good way, meaning I can’t take too many sips of this neat) 22/25

With water – richer flavour, more sweet / less tart, alcohol nip. Arrowroot cookie? Almond note. a little more water smooths away the ethanol. (23/25)

Finish – Dry, astringent, the fruit in the background, medium long. Water slightly sweetens the finish. 22/25

Balance – the nose and the taste go well together. The flavours work well, overall quite a well-balanced whiskey. 23/25

Score: Neat 89/100 With water 91/100

Note:

I usually add a few drops of water to my whiskies. I found this one improved with considerably more, about a water bottle capful to a 20 cc pour. I also find it becomes mother and more flavourful with more time in the glass.


I really like this whiskey. Although Irish is not a genre I usually go to, if I did have a “rotation” this one would certainly be in it. Anyone who likes unpeated, full-flavour whisk(e)y should try this.

@Nozinan a very good review of one of my favourite whiskies.You should decant this one after 3 to 6 months to enjoy it at it's best.The quality of this whisky does drop dramatically after a year of air exposure!

I've never used gas so I can't give an opinion but I would decant it just to be on the safe side. It's too good a whisky to take a chance with.

@talexander

What better way to finish off an Irish tasting than with a pot still whiskey (one of my favourite styles), and a cask strength one at that? I believe this is the second batch of Redbreast 12 Year Old Cask Strength that Midleton has released.

The colour is a light gold - lighter than I would have expected. Fairly shy on the nose, I get freshly sawn lumber, apples, vanilla and cinnamon. Slightly vegetal, with cucumber and spinach greens. A very light metallic quality. Water brings out some malt, but not much else. Definitely needs more time in the glass (the bottle was opened yesterday, as were the Bushmills and Powers I just reviewed).

Behind the alcohol heat, the palate features red apple skins, lime pith, lightly toasted oak, pepper and linseed oil. Where the nose was shy, the palate is quite powerful, especially with water. You can definitely tell that it is pot still whiskey like this that forms the background to the Powers Gold I just tasted.

The extremely long finish features much more oak, with leather and tobacco. While the nose may be a touch lacking in power, all elements of this fantastic whiskey feature great complexity. Although I may be finishing off this review now (as I'm starving and have to eat), I'm leaving this in my glass for a good long while. Jim Murray scores this a 97 - the slightly quiet nose prevents me from going that high, but still - this is truly a great experience. I may be a day late with most of my Irish reviews, but this was one worth waiting for.

talexander I agree with you 100% with regards to this whisky,it's definitely one my all time favourites.Just a word of caution, the quality of my bottle dropped off quite dramatically when it had been open for a year with about 100 mls left in the bottle.When I open my next bottle of it I'll be sure to decant it all at about 6 months so I can enjoy it at it's best!

I had the same experience as had @maltmate302, with the quality of my Redbreast 12 Cask Strength dropping off greatly after the bottle had been open for more than a year. I also would decant the next bottle at 6 months time open or less.

@newreverie

If you call yourself a lover of aged spirits, go buy this whisky.

Nose: Chocolate, bread pudding with cinnamon and brown sugar. Alcohol resides below the surface.

Taste: Interesting spice profile, slight alcohol burn but very manageable. Sweet, smooth, and luscious. Like a warm spiced apple dumpling with vanilla ice cream melting over my tongue.

Finish: Chocolate returns, mixed with cinnamon spice. The spice fades and leaves a honey sweet coating that lingers until I take another sip.

Balance: Amazing whisky. Smooth for cask strength and with layers upon layers of flavor. A must have in any collection.

Still one of my all time favorite drams. Along side the regular Redbreast 12yo expression. And lately, I have been really taken with the fruitiness and all round balance of Powers Signature Release. Already stocking up for St. Patrick's Day 2015, and onward.

@WhiskyBee

My first review since early May, as I’ve been but a casual sipper since then. Let’s be honest: I found I was drinking for the sake of drinking, rather than for appreciation, so I decided some self-discipline was in order. ’Nuf said.

The nose and palate tend to get rusty after having lain dormant, so my score may reflect the mere joy of the first serious tasting evening in several months. Or it may reflect how good I think Redbreast 12 CS is. I’ll amend things as necessary as I get back into a regular (but disciplined) whisky routine.

Most of you probably know the story behind this one. It’s Redbreast 12 yo (always my favorite Irish whiskey) in straight-out-of-the-cask strength. As the Gershwin brothers said, “Who could ask for anything more?”

I can handle this one neat (I’m half-Irish, after all), but a splash of water opens up several fruity delights. Water, however, tends to weaken some of the zing, so I suggest enjoying half a dram at full power and half with a one-second pour from the water bottle. (I’m a tap-water advocate, but we have horrible-tasting H2O in my neighborhood.)

Nose: Lovely fruits, both fresh and dried. Cocoanut and vanilla lay the foundation, with layers of raisins, apples, pears, and plenty of under-ripe bananas on top. All surrounded by almonds soaked in 7-Up. A flawless nose.

Palate: So rich and malty, it could pass for Scotch. Very hot and full of sharp sherry when neat; loaded with vanilla and fruits with water added. Citrus fruits, vine fruits, dried fruits, melons…there’s dashes of all. Water extracts a layer of butterscotch / chocolate icing. Let it swish, let it dance.

Finish: Longer than a Grateful Dead jam session. Add some perfectly charred, sweet-marinated ribeye steak to everything that’s on the palate. A denouement that’s as satisfying as the climax.

Give it a lash, lads, and hold your hours. If whiskey were women, this one is Maureen O’Hara.

Brilliant whisky. I scored it almost identical. Almost the same notes too. Nice one to come back to after a break.

I have also realized that I've been drinking to simply write reviews and not so much for the enjoyment. Wonder if there's a nice way of doing both?

Cheers to my two buddies, WhiskyBee and MaltActivist, for their kind words for my favorite whiskey. Ok, one of them, but certainly at the top of that list. What I enjoy about the Redbreast 12yo Cask Stength and the Redbreast 12yo regular strength is they are both outstanding siblings from a fine family, but with different yet enjoyable personalities. Both make for a rousing good party.

@MaltActivist

Oh yes! These are the moments you wait for. When simply bringing the glass to your nose gets your pulse racing because you know if it smells this good it's going to taste even better!

Irish whiskies are making a huge comeback of late. I read some where that for the first time since 1930 the US consumes more Irish whisky than Scotch whisky. Quite a remarkable statistic that.

Must be all those awards they've been picking up in the last year or so. This cask strength liquid gold being one of them.

Owned by Irish Distillers this cask strength version is basically their standard 12 (which is bottled at 40%) but with more bite.

While matured almost exclusively in Oloroso casks it does not allow the sherry to overpower. Instead it maintains a firm grasp on the integrity of the spirit.

This style of whiskey is now exclusive only to the Irish and is known as Single Pot Still irish Whiskey (by law). This basically means that a combination of malted and un-malted barley is used in the production process and the spirit is triple distilled in a single pot still.

Nose: Absolutely gorgeous. Very sweet. Almost winey. But has a pinch of salt too. Honey on pink lemon. Love hearts. Nectarines on top of vanilla sponge cake. Ripe figs and unripe bananas covered in sweet lime. This one renders you almost speechless.

Palate: Lots of spicy citrus. The same honey on melon but now with a dash of oaky cinnamon. All of this against a backdrop of soft fruits expertly complementing the spices.

Finish: Arrives late but when it does it stays. The fruits are back. So are the spices.

I know the Scots and the Irish are always arguing over who invented whisky. I don't know the answer to that. But I do know who just might end up doing a better job.

Your enthusiasm comes through in this review. I would caution you though, that one expression doesn't indicate the better producer (Scotland or Ireland). While I can't throw in one of my favourites (Bladnoch Scotch made by Irishman Raymond Armstrong), I've ad some near perfect Aberlour A'Bunadhs and Springbanks. And Amrut could on occasion blow them all away...

@MaltActivist thank you for another thorough review. This expression sounds mouth watering. I'm interested in Redbreast - but yet to try any.

@Nock

I opened this bottle on my birthday (October 10th) along with a few other cask strength bottles. Here are the notes from that experience.

Nose: Super hot on the nose. WOW!! Fresh fruit straight away: sweet red apples, pears, and strawberries all hovering over a base of oak. After a little time I am really picking up on some bourbon flavors – that sweet bourbon nose of caramel, apples, brandy, butter, and brown sugar. Perhaps a bit to bourbony for my nose? Still, you can tell it isn’t bourbon. There is an almost saccharin type sweetness to this nose.

Taste: Sweet and sour baked apples coated in sugar. Just a huge sweet fruit bomb with nothing bitter or off (and no soap or rotten hay)

Finish: Huge grassy finish with tons of tart apples (red delicious, gala, fuji, and granny smith), and very spicy: tons of pepper, cumin, cardamom, cinnamon, and all spice. Big and long for a triple distilled Irish whiskey! No crazy caramel!

Complexity, Balance: Quite complex for an Irish whiskey. I love the extra kick from the cask strength. The apples and fruit cross the spectrum while allowing other notes to pop up and around for little added bits of curiosity. I can’t fault it for much. Everything is behaving just as it should. It is everything Glenfiddich and Glenlivet should be!

Aesthetic experience: I really like the color and look of this bottle. It is very elegant and traditional looking – seriously it looks like a whisky bottle from 80 years ago . . . if it were being made today . . . to my imagination . I also love the batch stamp with the ABV. It is reminiscent of the new Laphroaig design. Very little not to love in this totally unpeated non-scotch.

Conclusion: I don’t love easy going whisky. In my mind that is the very definition of Irish whiskey. So this is one of the few Irish drams I was possibly going to like. And I do like it. Further, it takes water very well. I watered it down to 40% and found it very good – this is highly unusual for me. I almost always dislike water in my whisky. This is a huge exception. I highly recommend it.

I'm glad you are enjoying your bottle. I bought a bottle last year and didn't much care for it. Oh well. It was very expensive, as well, for what it is. I paid $80 American for it. This said, I didn't water my glasses as much as you watered yours. Maybe that was my downfall. To me, it wasn't a fruit bomb. It had a sickly sweet hard alcohol flavor that didn't open up for my tastebuds much as all. It reminded me of Cutty Sark, a whisky I have never learned to love since I was in my late teens and first tasted it. Thanks for your review. You express yourself well.

Glad to hear that you like the Redbreast 12 Cask Strength. I find it easy to like too. It would help, though, if there were some more of it around to be purchased. Redbreast 12 CS has been a pretty scarce item to find in my region, and, I am sure, other regions as well.

@Bigtuna

I’ve been a fan of the standard Redbreast 12 for sometime now; it’s easily one of the best Irish whiskies readily available here in North Carolina. I picked this bottle up back in September 2012 while in Ireland for a wedding with my wife. This was our first trip to Ireland. While I was there I also got a chance to taste the Redbreast 15, Powers John Lane 12, Green Spot, and several of the different Jamesons. When it was all said and done I came back with the Cask Strength; however, a bottle of the John Lane almost made it back too. I’ve been waiting to open this for some time now and tonight was the night; after all it’s St. Paddy’s Day! Upon the first sip I was instantly taken back to The Stags Head in Dublin where I first had this dram. To me this is a truly magical whisky and one I will try to save for special occasions.

This was tasted neat from a newly opened bottle in a Glencairn glass. No water was added. This bottle was batch B1/11, bottled at 57.7% ABV.

Nose: Strong vanilla, slight burn due to the high ABV, bananas/fresh baked banana bread, somewhat floral (smell of local honey), apples?

Taste: Creamy, more vanilla, spicy (not pepper however), hint of citrus, floral honey (again much like my friends local honey), really rich and layered

Finish: Moderate to long, more citrus and spice leading to vanilla, maybe butterscotch, dark caramel

Balance: Very smooth, nothing overpowers, the flavors blend so well, the nose really translates well into the taste/palate.

Overall, this is a great whisky. I feel like it’s a step up from the Redbreast12 and from what I remember it has a richness that wasn’t found in the 15 (however, the 15 is no slouch). Being mainly a scotch drinker this added spiciness really appealed to me. I look forward to seeing how this bottle will mature over time and I will try to update this review in the near future at which time I may try it with touch of water.

@Victor

The reviewed bottle has been open about 6 months and is 2/3rds full.

Nose: delicious very intense intoxicating vanilla with other light wood flavours, some barley-style citrus, and other malted and unmalted barley flavours. A bit floral with a hint of roses and carnations. This is similar to the 40% ABV Redbreast 12 nose, only ramped up to 4 times the intensity

Taste: the nose flavours translate gloriously. This is sweeter on the palate than in the nose. Fantastic!

Finish: the same delicious intensity continues unabated strong and long

Balance: it would be absolutely criminal if this wonderful juice is not continued indefinitely at this extremely high quality level. This is "95-Class" all the way.

If you like standard Redbreast 12, after you try this, you will wonder "where has this whiskey been all of my life?"

@OlJas, yes, whisk(e)y in general has huge differences in distribution, availability, and pricing. Knowing what things cost generally, and in advance, is a necessary requirement to knowing whether the price you see in front of you is a bargain, a typical offering price, or a rip-off. Once in awhile I will see something offered and think, "Hey, that is a VERY LOW PRICE for that whisk(e)y." Sometimes it has been hard for me to pull the trigger and buy it because it wasn't one I was thinking of getting at that time...but, when I did buy it, I have never once been sorry I did buy it later...and have generally seen the same product thereafter offered at much higher prices. Apropos of Redbreast 12, our local stores sell the standard 12, but not the Cask Strength. Standard Redbreast 12 in my county went from $ 42 to $ 59 recently. That is a 40% increase in one increment. I had to hussle to find a bottle of the Cask Strength, because it is pretty rare around DC.

This is the best Irish whiskey I had so far! Had it at a (very good) tasting Fruit explosions all the way! But after that came the Rattray Mortlach 17 c/s and Bowmore 21 c/s sherry finish... boy oh boy

@markjedi1

Redbreast is an Irish Pure Pot Still whiskey, meaning the mashbill contains both malted and unmalted barely. It is created at the Old Middleton distillery. The Redbreast 12 Year Old and 15 Year Old are already highly regarded, but since the end of 2011 a 12 Year Old cask strength edition has been added to the range. It is bottled at a massive 57,7% ABV. The first batch is a vatting of 68 casks, a mix of bourbon and oloroso cask, so there is plenty to go around.

A very stout nose on baked banana, drenched in caramel. Creamy! A lot of spices, to many to name, enriching the nose tremendously. It literally makes my mouth water. Fairly straightforward, but oh so good!

It explodes on the palate. Vanilla, milk chocolate, preserved fruit, grain and quite some oak. Thanks to the cask strength, it is very spicy with hot chili and woodspice in the lead. Again very creamy with a large dose of caramel and toffee. Boy, this is so enjoyable. Not overly complex, but who cares when a whiskey is that good?

The finish is very long, very sweet and spicy. Vanilla and caramel linger a long time.

I already enjoyed the Redbreast at drinking strength, but this is extremely nice (for an Irish, at least). Around 65 EUR, although I have not seen it around in Belgium too much. Recommended!

Happy St Patrick’s Day!

Popular Redbreast whiskies