Whisky Connosr
Shop Join

Glenfarclas 12 Year Old

Sherry Coat

1 684

@RianCReview by @RianC

8th May 2018


  • Nose
  • Taste
  • Finish
  • Balance
  • Overall

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

Before we get stuck in to the review a little bit of background preamble is required for this particular bottle . . .

You may notice that this bottle is from Nov 2013 and has sat in my stash for a good chunk of the time that has elapsed between then and now. Around four years ago I bought another 'farclas 12 but had some issues with the cork. Long story short, Masters of Malt replaced the bottle, which was very good of them, but what was even better was that they encouraged me to 'dispose' of the former bottle as and how I saw fit! Amazingly, I decided to drink the bottle (some creative make shift corks were employed and I learned the valuable lesson to always have spare corks to hand!) rather than pour it down the sink . . . Anyway, the whisky was good and was probably one of my first trys of a sherried whisky after a few of the Aberlours. I can't be sure but have a feeling the bottle being reviewed here was from an earlier batch than that one.

So, how will this one fare?

Review is neat, bottle half full and been open almost two months.

Nose - creamy, sweet sherry. Vanilla, a touch of smoke and some faint leather/old book notes. Worth noting that at first this was all sherry and not that appealing; the air and time have helped bring things into more of a balance and soften the overt sweet, syrupy sherry that was prominent. There's concentrated fruit syrup (pomegranate?), fresh fruit - red berries like strawberries, cherries & raspberries, sweet plums and a hint of dried fruit - raisins and figs. Some soft spice - cinnamon and orange peel.

Taste - less sweet on the palette. The creamy malt comes forward and develops into sweet and sour fruits - more on the sweet side though. In particular, that pomegranate syrup comes through with a dark concentrated presence. Mouth feel is decent if a little on the thinner side.

Finish - short to medium. Sweet syrup lingers with some mild tannins that dry the mouth quite nicely - not much bitterness here at all but there is a slight note of cinnamon at the death.

When I first opened this I honestly thought someone had poured sherry straight into the bottle to top it up! I've still never had a bad Glenfarclas but I'd have to say this is below par for them. It could be that my taste buds have changed (they've certainly tried many more whiskies since then) and I'm not really a fan of the overly sweet sherry style but this isn't as good as the last bottle I had; that was much nuttier and had more balance and complexity from memory - it certainly didn't hang around on my shelf for very long!

All of this feels a little moot though as I believe they are discontinuing the 12?! Not bad by any means but I would have always recommended the 12 as a good vfm sherried whisky - I wouldn't on this showing necessarily.

I've opted for a mark of 84 but that's as good as it's been since being open and my taste-buds feel 'on-point' this evening. First opened I'd have marked it 80, 81 at best.

Related Glenfarclas reviews


OdysseusUnbound commented

I also had some “adventures” with Glenfarclas 12. You can look up my two reviews if you’re interested. I found my second bottle was not nearly as sweet as most Sherried malts. I’m guessing with a small(er), more “craft” producer like Glenfarclas (at least that’s how they market themselves) batch variation is probably more pronounced. Thanks for the review.

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

RianC commented

@OdysseusUnbound - I noticed them after I'd posted this one, thanks - seems it's perhaps a variable malt in quality/batch terms but perhaps for reasons you outline. As said above, still yet to have a bad 'farclas and the 15 is excellent!

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

Wierdo commented

I wonder if maybe Glenfarclas is one of those malts that really benefits from getting a bit of air the bottle for a month or two to help it develop?

In the last couple of years I've had bottles of the 12 and the 15. Both times initially on opening I've been quite disappointed and felt there was sherry and not a lot else going on. But given time with air in the bottle I've noticed they've become a bit more complex with nuttiness, biscuit notes and even a slight hint of peat.

But then you've had this bottle open a while so maybe the batch variation is a bit off par?

5 years ago 2Who liked this?

RianC commented

@Wierdo - You could well be right. I'd say most whiskys that are 'craft' tend to need a bit of time to settle down and open up in the bottle but some can be amazing as soon as the cork is popped. I've always found Glenfarclas to be decent straight away to be fair but I guess not every batch/bottle is going to be tip top.

On a tangent - I'm finding Bruichladdich whiskys need a bit of time but then they keep on getting better; similar to Springbank, say.

5 years ago 1Who liked this?

Wierdo commented

What are you currently drinking from Bruichladdich @RianC ?

5 years ago 0

RianC commented

@Wierdo - Laddie Ten 2nd ed - been open a week or so and it's getting better every time I pop the cork. Pushing for best non-peated Scotch I've had . . .

5 years ago 0

You must be signed-in to comment here

Sign in